Jo Carr-West discusses a new approach to domestic abuse in the Family Court

  • April 14, 2021
  • By Jo Carr-West, Partner

An important Court of Appeal judgment has called for a shift in the approach of Family Court judges to allegations of domestic abuse raised in cases concerning the arrangements to be made for children. Fundamentally, the court recognised the need to focus on wider patterns of behaviour within a relationship, and not solely on individual incidents.  The intervention is timely given the progress of the Domestic Abuse Bill through Parliament, which seeks to enable a more effective response to Domestic Abuse at every level.

Under the Children Act 1989 (as amended by the Child and Families Act 2014), there is a presumption that the involvement of a parent in their child’s life will be in the child’s best interests unless it is shown that this is not the case. If one parent has perpetrated domestic abuse against the other, this may mean that ongoing contact with that parent would be harmful to the child, and not in their best interests, or that contact needs to be limited or monitored to ensure the child’s safety. The Family Court therefore frequently has to consider allegations of domestic abuse and assess whether the allegations are true, and, if so, how they should impact the arrangements to be made for the children.

In Re H-N and Others [2021] EWCA Civ 448  the Court of Appeal was asked to consider four cases where judges had, according to the appellants, inadequately handled allegations of domestic abuse. The Court of Appeal considered that the judges had, firstly, focused too narrowly on specific events, rather than taking a wider view on whether the alleged perpetrator had acted in a controlling or coercive way, and, secondly, had not adequately considered the impact of the abusive behaviour on the other parent and the child. In their judgment, the judges of the Court of Appeal discussed the evolving understanding of domestic abuse, and provided guidance on how it ought to be approached in the Family Court.

The Court of Appeal accepted that the “overwhelming majority” of domestic abuse is underpinned by coercive control, and that whether there has been an abusive pattern of coercive and/or controlling behaviour is likely to be the primary question in many cases where there is an allegation of domestic abuse. Not all poor behaviour in a relationship is abusive; behaviour is controlling if it is designed to make its victim subordinate or dependant, and is coercive if it used to harm, punish or frighten the victim.

The current practice of the court is generally to consider a limited number of alleged incidents detailed in a document known as a Scott Schedule, hear evidence in respect of each and determine whether it took place as alleged. The Court of Appeal held that the time has come to move away from this approach, as it can result in judges taking a narrow view, ignoring the cumulative impact of behaviour and the characteristics underlying it.

The reason it is important to establish whether there has been a pattern of controlling or coercive behaviour is because such a finding is very likely to impact the assessment of the risk posed by future contact between the alleged perpetrator and the children. As the court explained, to regard controlling or coercive behaviour as is in the past and irrelevant to the risk of future harm to the child is old fashioned and no longer acceptable. Simply because the risk of physical abuse has been removed does not mean that the coercive or controlling nature of the perpetrator will not manifest in another manner.

The Court of Appeal made clear that judges should only investigate alleged domestic abuse where it is relevant to the outcome of the dispute over the arrangements to be made for the children. For example, if both parties agree that the children should spend substantial amounts of time with each parent, accepting that such an arrangement does not pose a risk to the children’s safety, then there is no need for the court to consider allegations of domestic abuse.

It is clear that going forward judges will need to adopt a broader approach to allegations of domestic abuse than has often been the case to date. Analysing alleged abusive behaviour by considering whether or not it formed part of a pattern of controlling and / or coercive behaviour will offer a more nuanced, and therefore more valuable, assessment than simply looking at individual incidents. Whilst there is likely to be a period of adjustment as this is incorporated into the judicial approach, it should lead to better judicial decision-making and safer arrangements for children.

If you have any questions about how the family courts approach allegations of domestic abuse or other aspects of family law please contact Jo Carr-West on 020 7412 0050 or

Related News

Oct 19, 2021
Nicole Derham discusses privatising the court process in family law
Oct 11, 2021
Jo Carr-West discusses one of the richest British-born divorcees, Kirsty Bertarelli, in Family Law Week and The Legal Diary
Oct 11, 2021
Mark Stiebel joins Hunters Law as a Partner in the Family Department
Sep 15, 2021
Henry Hood recognised in the Citywealth Leaders List Top 100 Private Client Lawyers 2021
Sep 14, 2021
Hunters recognised as one of the 2021 eprivateclient Top Family Law Firms
Sep 06, 2021
Hunters Law shortlisted at the Family Law Awards 2021
Aug 02, 2021
Henry Hood examines the Thwaite jurisdiction where a client seeks adjustment of a financial remedy order in The Review
Jul 29, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses what happens to the children when separated parents differ on relocating in WealthBriefing
Jul 28, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses a practical guide to emergency private children cases in The Review
Jul 27, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses what separated parents wanting to relocate within the UK need to know in Family Law Week

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)