News

Henry Hood and Nicole Derham discuss what separated parents should be aware of when taking their children abroad on holiday in The Times

  • June 10, 2021
  • By Henry Hood, Senior Partner and

This article was originally published in The Times and can be accessed here

Can I take my child abroad on holiday if the other parent doesn’t agree?

Separated parents taking different perspectives on the risks of international travel this summer may find themselves facing a legal nightmare.

Assessing the risks posed by new variants, interpreting government guidance on “amber” countries, and weighing up whether it’s worth isolating on return may leave some separated parents disagreeing on whether their child should travel abroad this summer. Those who can’t find consensus may have no choice but to stay in the UK, as in most cases taking a child abroad without the other parent’s agreement or the court’s permission will amount to the crime of child abduction.

This gives many parents a veto on foreign holidays, and whilst the courts disapprove of this power being exercised unreasonably, the current uncertainty around the safety of foreign travel means it may be difficult to say a parent opposing foreign travel is being unreasonable.

In some cases, a parent can take children abroad without the other parent’s agreement. If a parent does not legally have “parental responsibility” for a child (which may arise, for example, where the father is not on the child’s birth certificate) their agreement is not needed to take the child abroad. Additionally, where the court has ordered that a child lives with a parent, that parent can take the child abroad for up to a month without the agreement of the other. They should, however, still give reasonable notice of the trip to the other parent.

If agreement can’t be reached, the matter can be taken to court; this can be expensive and should generally be the last resort. A judge will decide if the foreign holiday should go ahead based on the child’s best interests. In these unprecedented times the outcome may be difficult to predict, and whilst, for example, a trip to visit family is more likely to be considered appropriate than a simple holiday, much will depend on the circumstances.

Alternatives to court exist: parents can negotiate through specialist family lawyers; attempt mediation, where a mediator facilitates discussion and suggests potential solutions; or seek a neutral evaluation from a barrister on the court’s likely approach. None of these routes, however, guarantees resolution.

Arbitration is an additional option where the holiday destination is a member of the 1980 Hague Convention on Child Abduction. It offers the finality of court proceedings but with added speed and flexibility: an experienced lawyer is jointly appointed to make a binding decision which can be made into a court order.

If agreement is reached or permission given, it is important to take a copy of the court order or the other parent’s written agreement when travelling – failing to do so can cause problems at borders, potentially ruining a much-anticipated holiday.

Related News

Mar 05, 2024
Domestic abuse and international child abduction – developing better solutions for children under the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention
Feb 27, 2024
Hunters bolsters family law team with the appointment of two new experts
Feb 24, 2024
Richard Kershaw explores private equity interests on divorce in The Law Society Gazette
Feb 14, 2024
Henry Hood and Anna Roiser examine the new transparency pilot in the family court
Feb 09, 2024
Henry Hood and Anna Roiser discuss the transparency reporting pilot for financial remedy proceedings in eprivateclient
Feb 08, 2024
Olivia Piercy and Henry Hood explore the intersection between LSPOs and economic abuse in Financial Remedies Journal
Feb 08, 2024
Olivia Piercy and Anita Mehta consider abuse in divorce settlements in Today’s Family Lawyer
Jan 31, 2024
Richard Kershaw comments on the Supreme Court judgment in Potanina v Potanin
Jan 16, 2024
Henry Hood recognised in eprivateclient’s ’50 Most Influential’ 2024
Dec 19, 2023
Hunters’ Family team celebrates pro-bono successes and expands commitment

               

© Hunters Law LLP 2024 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

>