News

Why All Settlement Negotiations Should Be “Subject To Contract” Until They Are Agreed

  • August 19, 2013
  • By Hunters Law

The High Court has held that a letter from an employer to an employee containing a proposed settlement offer, together with a subsequent letter of acceptance from the employee, amounted to a binding agreement. In the absence of the words “subject to contract” in the offer letter, the employer could not continue to negotiate with the employee.

In Newbury v Sun Microsystems [2013], Mr Newbury made a claim against his employer, Sun Microsystems (“Sun”), for unpaid commission.  Sun, in response, filed a counterclaim for recovery of an alleged overpayment of commission.  Just before the final hearing was due to commence, Sun’s solicitors wrote to Mr Newbury’s solicitors and put forward a settlement proposal in full and final settlement of Mr Newbury’s claim and Sun’s counterclaim.  Sun’s solicitors omitted to state that the settlement proposal was subject to contract.

Mr Newbury’s solicitors responded the same day and accepted the terms of the proposed settlement.

A dispute arose between the parties as to the way in which the settlement should be recorded and Sun wanted to impose an obligation of confidentiality on Mr Newbury and insert terms into the agreement relating to income tax and national insurance contributions, none of which had been included in Sun’s original offer letter.  Mr Newbury applied to the Court for a declaration that a binding settlement agreement had been reached on the terms set out in the original offer letter, which he had accepted by return.

The High Court held that the letters constituted a binding agreement between the parties which settled the claim and the counterclaim.  Importantly, the original offer letter was not expressed as being subject to contract, which meant that there could not be any ongoing negotiations between the parties.

This case highlights why it is essential to add the words “subject to contract” in any settlement offers or correspondence during negotiations where it is intended that the settlement should not be considered binding until a formal written agreement, for example a settlement agreement, has been executed.  If a party makes an offer that is not “subject to contract”, it should ensure that all of the terms that it wishes to include in the settlement proposal are clearly set out.  Once the offer is accepted, it is too late to change it.

If you would like any further information about the subject-matter of this article, or if you would like any other employment or business law advice, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our Business Law Team

Related News

Jul 22, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Constance Tait examine the impact on trademark litigation and provide 10 tips on navigating the post-Brexit era in Managing IP
Jul 16, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Anastassia Dimmek examine the growing threat of zombie firms in Lawyer Monthly
Jul 07, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine a report suggesting that firms with targeted support for ethnic minority workers see benefits
Jun 28, 2021
Richard Baxter discusses UK-EU Data Protection and how adequacy decisions avoid imminent disruption to data flows
Jun 23, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine the recent Burnell v Trans-Tag Ltd case in the High Court
Jun 22, 2021
Anastassia Dimmek discussed the key challenges of protecting clients’ healthy businesses from zombie firms in a webinar hosted by Advoselect
Jun 18, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait discuss the looming annual returns deadline for employee share schemes
May 18, 2021
Hunters hosted the Withdrawal and The Trade Marks Act 1994 webinar
Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)