News

Vanessa Friend and Henry Hood discuss litigants in person and family law in The Times

  • July 12, 2018
  • By Vanessa Friend, Senior Associate and Henry Hood, Partner

No one wins from litigation in person

The lack of legal aid for private law children and family matters, save for in cases of domestic abuse, is driving more parents to represent themselves in court. The latest Ministry of Justice figures show that nearly 36 per cent of cases included a litigant in person.

Last month the incoming president of the family division of the High Court, Sir Andrew McFarlane, warned that the withdrawal of legal aid had “plainly caused difficulty” and he worried about parents who “walk away because they simply cannot face the court process”.

Whatever the reasons for the increase in litigants in person, the impact on the courts cannot be denied; it makes the proceedings more difficult for all involved.

Family lawyers frequently have to deal with parents who are litigants in person. Those litigants are often confused by the legal process or, worse, overly bullish and unwilling to engage in any reasonable discussions.

They often create unnecessary delays and expect lawyers on the other side to be constantly available. One parent delivered three plastic bags of documents to our office the night before a hearing and expected us to organise them for the court. They frequently threaten to report solicitors to the regulator if they do not comply with their requests.

The impact on clients who are paying for the benefit of being legally represented is increased costs. The burden of court preparation falls on them as the represented parties. There can also be a power imbalance, as litigants in person use their power to drive up the other party’s legal fees with unnecessary applications and correspondence.

Judges become frustrated with litigants in person and direct their legal argument and questions to the represented party’s lawyer. They may also appear to give the litigant in person the benefit of the doubt and direct further hearings or extensions to deadlines, which would not normally be expected.

Resolution, the family lawyers’ campaigning group, is considering the impact of litigants in person in family law and has interviewed parents who have acted in person. They reported feeling baffled by the legal terminology, confused by the court proceedings and ignored by judges and lawyers.

Recently, at a pro bono law clinic, a father in his early twenties asked a lawyer to review his application to have contact with his daughter. He was a student and had limited funds from part time work. He was close to tears as he struggled to understand the law and the fact that the lawyer could only offer him half an hour’s advice.

We train for years to become lawyers and it is unrealistic to expect parents to represent themselves in court. The legal profession as a whole must consider how best to support litigants in person, as the government’s plan to drive parents away from court and into alternative dispute resolution has not worked. If we cannot improve the system, the losers will be the children whose parents, as Sir Andrew said, simply “walk away”.

Vanessa Friend and Henry Hood

This article was originally published in The Times and can be accessed here, behind a paywall.

Related News

Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets
Jan 18, 2021
Family Mediation Week 2021
Nov 19, 2020
Jay Patel and Polly Atkins examine family law in the lead up to Brexit in Family Law Week
Nov 09, 2020
Richard Kershaw discusses trusts on divorce and their role in financial planning strategies
Nov 05, 2020
Hunters recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.