News

The right to erasure: interim or invariable?

  • July 17, 2017
  • By Hunters Law

The proposed Data Protection Bill (“new Bill”) will give people within the UK new rights to “require major social media platforms to delete information held about them at the age of 18” as stated in the Government’s Manifesto. Under the current Data Protection Act 1998, the right to erasure is restricted to circumstances where a complainant has suffered unwarranted and substantial damage or distress and therefore the new Bill is undoubtedly a significant step in enhancing the rights of young people with regard to information held about them by social media platforms.

So how do these new rights relate to Article 17 of the EU’s much anticipated General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (also discussed here) which comes into force across Member States on 25th May 2018? The Government has stated that the new Bill will enable the UK to meet its “obligations while we remain an EU member state” and “put the UK in the best position to maintain our ability to share data with other EU member states and internationally after we leave the EU“. Although by no means a certainty, in view of the proposed ‘Great Repeal Bill’, which is intended to incorporate EU law into UK national law, it is possible that UK national legislation will continue to reflect the right to be forgotten and to erasure under Article 17 as long as the UK aspires to share data with other EU Member States post Brexit. However, the Government has yet to provide any detail on how the new Bill will be implemented and there is no guarantee that the right to erasure is here to stay. If this is the case, young people wanting to take advantage of the opportunity to edit their childhood social media presence and gain some control over their online identity may need to be prepared to act quickly.

For further information, please contact your client partner at Hunters or any partner in the Business Services Department.

Related News

Jul 22, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Constance Tait examine the impact on trademark litigation and provide 10 tips on navigating the post-Brexit era in Managing IP
Jul 16, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Anastassia Dimmek examine the growing threat of zombie firms in Lawyer Monthly
Jul 07, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine a report suggesting that firms with targeted support for ethnic minority workers see benefits
Jun 28, 2021
Richard Baxter discusses UK-EU Data Protection and how adequacy decisions avoid imminent disruption to data flows
Jun 23, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine the recent Burnell v Trans-Tag Ltd case in the High Court
Jun 22, 2021
Anastassia Dimmek discussed the key challenges of protecting clients’ healthy businesses from zombie firms in a webinar hosted by Advoselect
Jun 18, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait discuss the looming annual returns deadline for employee share schemes
May 18, 2021
Hunters hosted the Withdrawal and The Trade Marks Act 1994 webinar
Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)