News

Tax Avoidance – when does it become ‘abuse’?

  • July 24, 2013
  • By Hunters Law

Chief Executives of public companies seem to be grilled about ‘abusive’ tax avoidance by MPs on a daily basis. Tax avoidance schemes used by celebrities are splashed over the front pages. Now, the Government has introduced a ‘General Anti-Abuse Rule’ (‘GAAR’) to tackle it. Tax avoidance has never been so topical.

On 17th July, the Finance Bill 2013 received Royal Assent, meaning the GAAR is now in force.  GAAR’s purpose is to prevent tax advantages resulting from ‘abusive tax arrangements’, and sets out guidance on what this means.  While the scope of GAAR will become more clearly defined in time, it is a fundamentally different approach from previous ‘anti-avoidance’ legislation to address this high-profile issue.  Courts can now potentially override tax rules if they find an arrangement to be ‘abusive’, so the grey area between what is ‘avoidance’ and what is ‘abusive’ will need extra scrutiny from advisors and clients alike.

The Finance Act 2013 has also introduced significant other changes affecting private individuals, notably the Statutory Residence Test (which provides some clarity to those unsure if they are tax-resident), provisions to deter the holding of high-value residential properties within companies, and conditions and restrictions concerning the treatment of liabilities for inheritance tax purposes for deaths on or after 17th July.

If you would like any further information on how these changes might affect you, please contact the partner at Hunters having responsibility for your legal matters, or send an email stating the nature of your query to the following address: info@hunters-solicitors.co.uk

Related News

Feb 09, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s First Report on Capital Gains Tax, in Private Client Business
Jan 06, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s review of Capital Gains Tax
Nov 30, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in WealthBriefing
Nov 13, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in the case of Re estate of Ellen Beatrice Brackstone [2020]
Oct 29, 2020
Julia Richards examines Section 33 of the Wills Act 1837
Oct 28, 2020
Daniel Watson examines Wills being witnessed remotely by video-link in Taxation
Sep 21, 2020
Hunters recognised as one of the 2020 eprivateclient Top Law Firms
Sep 04, 2020
Matthew Yates comments on video wills in the Financial Times
Aug 11, 2020
Daniel Watson examines the government’s newest legislation regarding Wills in Lawyer Monthly
Aug 04, 2020
Matthew Yates examines the recent change to the law of organ donation in England in STEP Journal

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.