Stephen Morrall’s article on Uber and the ‘gig’ economy in Global Payroll Association UK

  • December 07, 2016
  • By Hunters Law

First round to the drivers in a gig economy

It seemed never more straightforward to take a minicab than to hire an Uber.  You download the app and book a car.  You think that you are dealing with the mighty Uber, an organisation that has grown since 2009 from a group of 100 friends providing a black car service in San Francisco to a transportation network spanning 400 cities in 68 countries.  But if you read the small print, you will find that you are actually entering into a contract with the individual driver who runs his own mini-cab business and that Uber is only acting as the driver’s agent to set up the ride.

On 28th October 2016, an employment tribunal threw this argument out and rejected the wholly artificial construct that Uber’s lawyers had very carefully (and cleverly) conceived, but which did not reflect the reality of the situation. The tribunal found that the drivers were in fact “workers”, a status somewhere between employed and self-employed, but who are entitled to limited protection under the employment legislation.  Workers cannot be unfairly dismissed and they are not entitled to a redundancy payment; but some of the important worker protections do apply, for example, in relation to working time (the right to 5.6 weeks’ holiday, a 48 hour week and rest breaks), the right to be paid the national minimum wage, a prohibition on unlawful deductions from their wages, and protection against discrimination and in relation to whistle-blowing.

Uber has already said that it will appeal the decision, so the claimant drivers may have won the first battle but the war is not yet over.  The present position is that, where an individual provides services as part of a business carried on by someone else, s/he is likely to have the status of a worker who enjoys limited protection against exploitation by the business in which s/he is engaged.

It remains to be seen whether the decision will have implications beyond Uber for the numerous companies in the “gig” economy that engage people to provide services without employing them, as well as for those people who work through personal service companies.  Ironically, Uber is a victim of its own success as there is anecdotal evidence that many of its drivers positively like the flexibility that Uber offers them.  Employment law may not have caught up with the gig economy but no amount of artificial contract drafting can change the substance of a situation.  Contractual arrangements that do not reflect reality are likely to be rejected by the employment tribunals and courts.

This article was originally published in Global Payroll Association UK, and can be found here.

Stephen Morrall

Partner, Hunters incorporating May, May & Merrimans

Related News

Jul 22, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Constance Tait examine the impact on trademark litigation and provide 10 tips on navigating the post-Brexit era in Managing IP
Jul 16, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Anastassia Dimmek examine the growing threat of zombie firms in Lawyer Monthly
Jul 07, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine a report suggesting that firms with targeted support for ethnic minority workers see benefits
Jun 28, 2021
Richard Baxter discusses UK-EU Data Protection and how adequacy decisions avoid imminent disruption to data flows
Jun 23, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine the recent Burnell v Trans-Tag Ltd case in the High Court
Jun 22, 2021
Anastassia Dimmek discussed the key challenges of protecting clients’ healthy businesses from zombie firms in a webinar hosted by Advoselect
Jun 18, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait discuss the looming annual returns deadline for employee share schemes
May 18, 2021
Hunters hosted the Withdrawal and The Trade Marks Act 1994 webinar
Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)