News

Stephen Morrall and Annabelle Woosnam discuss pensions in the gig economy, in Employee Benefits

  • July 06, 2022
  • By Stephen Morrall, Partner and Annabelle Woosnam, Trainee Solicitor

This article was originally published in Employee Benefits, 06 July 2022, and can be found here.

An article published by the Financial Times on 14 June reported that ‘the UK pensions regulator has conceded that not all gig economy employers have done “the right thing” and offered pensions to staff’.  What does this mean?  Don’t staff have a legal right to a pension?

In recent years vast numbers of people have entered the “gig economy”, working on zero hours contracts or some kind of piece-work basis and employers have gone to great lengths to avoid their staff having the status of an employee or a worker.  Whilst this allows businesses flexibility, it disadvantages the individuals because they do not get the basic employment rights such as membership of a pension scheme – an issue which was considered in the recent landmark case of Uber BV v Aslam.

In order to qualify for certain key rights, you have to have “worker” status.  This is defined by statute and is a hybrid status, requiring personal service and a degree of mutuality of obligation. A qualifying worker will be entitled to auto-enrolment in a pension scheme and their employer will be required to make minimum pension payments. No such rights are granted, however, to self-employed contractors.

Differentiating between the two is by no means straightforward and how the statutory definition of worker should be interpreted has been a matter much deliberated by court and tribunals. The test that has been developed as a result is applied on a case by case basis, leading to notably inconsistent results.

In Uber BV v Aslam, the drivers persuaded the court that they were workers rather than self-employed. Conversely, in cases concerning Deliveroo riders and Yodel delivery people, those staff were found to be self-employed. People who perform remarkably similar jobs will therefore find themselves facing vastly different economic situations depending on who they work for.

As long as there is confusion as to what constitutes a worker, employers will try to deprive their staff of valuable and essential rights.  It should not be up to the Pensions Regulator to put moral pressure on companies to “do the right thing” and give their staff worker status. The law needs urgent reform.  The government needs to redefine “worker” and improve the lot of the millions who work in the gig economy.

 

Related News

Oct 18, 2022
Stephen Morrall comments on gig economy rulings challenging pension enrolment in Law360
Sep 20, 2022
Stephen Morrall and Annabelle Woosnam discuss the legal rights for gig economy employees to a pension in People Management
Feb 18, 2022
Gregor Kleinknecht discusses Trademarks, Design Rights and Copyright to Promote Business Growth and Innovation in University of Buckingham Press
Feb 11, 2022
Stephen Morrall comments on what COVID rules means for workers and employers in Mail Online, This is Money, Mail on Sunday, Daily Mail and MSN Money
Jan 14, 2022
Gregor Kleinknecht comments on the General Court clarifying the law on rights of representation before EU courts in Managing IP
Nov 30, 2021
Stephen Morrall and Aman Khokhar explore how employers can best determine worker status in People Management
Nov 17, 2021
Richard Baxter examines whether Brexit creates uncertainty for online software sales agents in Reports Legal
Nov 02, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Anastassia Dimmek examine the lessons learned from the cancellation of Banksy trademarks in Lawyer Monthly
Oct 20, 2021
Partner Richard Baxter is attending the FT Live’s The Banking Revolution
Oct 18, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait discuss considerations for dispute resolution and M&A scenarios

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)