News

Richard Kershaw comments on Supreme Court inheritance case in The Times

  • March 17, 2016
  • By Hunters Law

Battle of wills: when should a person’s dying wishes stand?

A last will and testament is a person’s final wishes over their property and estate. Or is it? Increasingly people are challenging their relatives’ wills and overturning them. The Supreme Court is now to hear a test case after the Court of Appeal awarded £164,000 to Heather Ilott, who challenged the will of her late mother, Melita Jackson.

Mrs Jackson died in 2004 leaving her entire £500,000 estate to three animal charities — Blue Cross, the RSPB and the RSPCA. She made clear her wish that none should go to her daughter, Heather, from whom she had been estranged for 26 years.

Heather Ilott challenged her mother’s will through the courts. In 2007, she was awarded £50,000 by District Judge Million to provide for her maintenance needs. She appealed but the Court of Appeal upheld the award in 2011. The case came before a High Court again for a decision and judge again endorsed the award made in 2007.

The dispute then went to the Court of Appeal, which last summer more than trebled the award to £164,000. This was to provide Mrs Ilott with enough money to buy the housing association property where she lives without causing her to lose her means-tested benefits. Now the three charities have been granted permission to bring the appeal in what will be the first test of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, which allows for wills to be varied.

Richard Kershaw, partner at Hunters, the Lincoln’s Inn firm, added: “If the Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal, it will push the door ajar and encourage many more cases of this kind in future.”

Read the full article in The Times here (behind a paywall).

Related News

Feb 09, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s First Report on Capital Gains Tax, in Private Client Business
Jan 06, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s review of Capital Gains Tax
Nov 30, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in WealthBriefing
Nov 13, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in the case of Re estate of Ellen Beatrice Brackstone [2020]
Oct 29, 2020
Julia Richards examines Section 33 of the Wills Act 1837
Oct 28, 2020
Daniel Watson examines Wills being witnessed remotely by video-link in Taxation
Sep 21, 2020
Hunters recognised as one of the 2020 eprivateclient Top Law Firms
Sep 04, 2020
Matthew Yates comments on video wills in the Financial Times
Aug 11, 2020
Daniel Watson examines the government’s newest legislation regarding Wills in Lawyer Monthly
Aug 04, 2020
Matthew Yates examines the recent change to the law of organ donation in England in STEP Journal

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.