News

Rejection to register Caffè Nero EU trademarks

  • November 29, 2016
  • By Hunters Law

By two separate decisions rendered on 26 October 2016, the EU General Court rejected applications to register as EU trade marks the word sign CAFFÈ NERO and a figurative sign containing the same words.

Registration was sought for classes 30 and 35, which relate to tea, coffees, biscuits and confectionery, and retail store services and retail services connected with coffee respectively. The applications were rejected.

The EU General Court agreed with the Board of Appeal that the “the literal translation into their own language of the expression ‘caffè nero’ will be understood by the general public as referring to coffee served as a beverage without any additions, and that that is how an Italian-speaking public will understand the expression ‘caffè nero’.”

Caffè Nero argued that the term “caffè nero” has no meaning either in Italian or in Italian coffee culture. Coffee is, in fact, referred to by using a specific name, not by reference to its colour.

The EU General court rejected the argument and stated that the public concerned would immediately perceive, without further reflection, that the goods are or contain black coffee or taste like that, and that the services relate to the sale and promotion of those goods.

It was thus decided that the marks applied for would be perceived as a direct and obvious reference to the nature of the goods and of the services relating to the goods. The court ruled that the marks were devoid of any distinctive character and added that the public may be even deceived into thinking they relate only to black coffee even if, in actual fact, this was not the case.

When applying to the EUIPO applicants must consider carefully how a mark is likely to be understood in the language of a member state and avoid words that are merely descriptive and are not distinctive.

For queries in relation to commercial matters, please contact the partner at Hunters having responsibility for your legal matters, or for new enquiries please contact Cécile de Lagarde or another member of our Business Services Team.

Caffè Nero Group Ltd v EUIPO, Cases T-29/16 and T-37/16, 27 October 2016

Related News

Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times
Feb 12, 2021
Richard Baxter and Hannah Solel examine data protection post-Brexit in Information Security Buzz
Feb 05, 2021
Budget 2021 – Still time to prepare for any changes to Business Asset Disposal Relief
Jan 13, 2021
Stephen Morrall and Hannah Solel discuss the gig economy in 2021 in Employee Benefits
Jan 11, 2021
Richard Baxter and Hannah Solel provide a legal update on data protection in 2021
Jan 06, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on unfair dismissal in Real Business
Dec 14, 2020
Hunters strengthens its Business team with new arrival
Jun 25, 2020
Stephen Morrall and Philippa Kum discuss witnessing a deed remotely
Jun 01, 2020
Amanda Lathia examines the legal challenges of returning to work during the post-COVID-19 lockdown in WealthBriefing

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)