News

Rejection to register Caffè Nero EU trademarks

  • November 29, 2016
  • By Hunters Law

By two separate decisions rendered on 26 October 2016, the EU General Court rejected applications to register as EU trade marks the word sign CAFFÈ NERO and a figurative sign containing the same words.

Registration was sought for classes 30 and 35, which relate to tea, coffees, biscuits and confectionery, and retail store services and retail services connected with coffee respectively. The applications were rejected.

The EU General Court agreed with the Board of Appeal that the “the literal translation into their own language of the expression ‘caffè nero’ will be understood by the general public as referring to coffee served as a beverage without any additions, and that that is how an Italian-speaking public will understand the expression ‘caffè nero’.”

Caffè Nero argued that the term “caffè nero” has no meaning either in Italian or in Italian coffee culture. Coffee is, in fact, referred to by using a specific name, not by reference to its colour.

The EU General court rejected the argument and stated that the public concerned would immediately perceive, without further reflection, that the goods are or contain black coffee or taste like that, and that the services relate to the sale and promotion of those goods.

It was thus decided that the marks applied for would be perceived as a direct and obvious reference to the nature of the goods and of the services relating to the goods. The court ruled that the marks were devoid of any distinctive character and added that the public may be even deceived into thinking they relate only to black coffee even if, in actual fact, this was not the case.

When applying to the EUIPO applicants must consider carefully how a mark is likely to be understood in the language of a member state and avoid words that are merely descriptive and are not distinctive.

For queries in relation to commercial matters, please contact the partner at Hunters having responsibility for your legal matters, or for new enquiries please contact Cécile de Lagarde or another member of our Business Services Team.

Caffè Nero Group Ltd v EUIPO, Cases T-29/16 and T-37/16, 27 October 2016

Related News

Jul 22, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Constance Tait examine the impact on trademark litigation and provide 10 tips on navigating the post-Brexit era in Managing IP
Jul 16, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Anastassia Dimmek examine the growing threat of zombie firms in Lawyer Monthly
Jul 07, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine a report suggesting that firms with targeted support for ethnic minority workers see benefits
Jun 28, 2021
Richard Baxter discusses UK-EU Data Protection and how adequacy decisions avoid imminent disruption to data flows
Jun 23, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine the recent Burnell v Trans-Tag Ltd case in the High Court
Jun 22, 2021
Anastassia Dimmek discussed the key challenges of protecting clients’ healthy businesses from zombie firms in a webinar hosted by Advoselect
Jun 18, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait discuss the looming annual returns deadline for employee share schemes
May 18, 2021
Hunters hosted the Withdrawal and The Trade Marks Act 1994 webinar
Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)