News

Rebecca Christie examines the Challen case in Lawyer Monthly

  • May 30, 2019
  • By Rebecca Christie, Associate

Last month, the world saw pictures of Sally Challen at home with her two sons for the first time in nearly a decade.

By now most will be familiar with Mrs Challen’s case, which is a tragic one. In 2010, Mrs Challen killed her husband by striking him multiple times with a hammer whilst he ate his breakfast in their home. She had apparently tried to leave him on several occasions, citing allegations of emotional abuse. Her husband had allegedly belittled her, controlled her money and did not allow her to socialise without him.

In 2011, Mrs Challen was convicted of his murder and sentenced to life with a minimum term of 22 years. At that time the law failed to address loss of control by a victim of non-physical domestic abuse as defence, and to recognise the devastating impact that such abuse can have on its victims.

In December 2015, Parliament finally criminalised ‘controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship’ under section 76 of the Serious Crime Act 2015. The aim was to allow ‘victims who experience the type of behaviour that stops short of serious physical violence, but amounts to extreme psychological and emotional abuse’ and ‘to bring their perpetrators to justice and seek protection from the law’. Family lawyers in particular welcomed this change to the law, having sadly encountered cases of emotional abuse for years and seen first-hand how difficult it is for an abused partner ‘just to leave’.

In March 2019, the Court of Appeal held that her murder conviction should be quashed, and she should be granted a retrial due to fresh evidence that was capable of suggesting that Mrs Challen was particularly vulnerable to her husband’s treatment. The latest development in the case occurred last month when she was released from prison on bail and Mr Justice Edis set a date for a further hearing in the summer, “if necessary”.

The wider recognition of coercive control as an important element in a loss of control defence, suggests significant progress in the court system after this recent change in legislation. The decision reflects a developing society. Recent documentaries such as ‘Surviving R. Kelly’, ‘Abused By My girlfriend’ and the #MeToo movement show that we are talking more about domestic abuse, whether it be physical, emotional, financial or sexual. It is hoped that the Government’s proposed Domestic Abuse Bill will take these discussions even further.

These movements and documentaries also highlight the significance of acknowledging that the roles of perpetrator and victim can be male or female. It is important to appreciate that male victims can also suffer from all types of abuse and in fact that they can suffer twice over; first at the hands of the abuser and then when support networks do not recognise the impact of domestic abuse on men.

The announcement of Sally Challen’s retrial will undoubtedly affect many other domestic abuse cases. Sally Challen’s case demonstrates the court’s greater understanding of the effects of psychological harm on victims of abuse and should give hope to those suffering from such abuse that their side of the story will now be heard.

This article was originally published in Lawyer Monthly and can be accessed here


Related News

Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets
Jan 18, 2021
Family Mediation Week 2021
Nov 19, 2020
Jay Patel and Polly Atkins examine family law in the lead up to Brexit in Family Law Week
Nov 09, 2020
Richard Kershaw discusses trusts on divorce and their role in financial planning strategies
Nov 05, 2020
Hunters recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.