News

Rebecca Christie examines Noah Baumbach’s new film, ‘Marriage Story’ in Spear’s

  • December 06, 2019
  • By Rebecca Christie, Associate

‘Marriage Story’? Rather Divorce Story: A family lawyer’s perspective on Noah Baumbach’s new film

This article was originally published in Spear’s and can be accessed here

I expected ‘Marriage Story’ to be like any other movie in the Hollywood divorce canon; a ‘Kramer vs Kramer’ style ugly court battle or an overly idealised Rom Com like ‘Parent Trap’. I had no expectation it would go into the mechanics of separating your life from someone else’s. That it did was a surprise, although it ought not to have been, given that 42%[1] of all marriages end in divorce.

The film depicts what happens to Charlie (Adam Driver), Nicole (Scarlett Johansson) and their son, Henry, when Nicole decides that they should separate. Noah Baumbach, the director, tackles separation and divorce in a way that other Hollywood films tend to gloss over. He asks the big questions, ‘What are my parenting rights?’ or ‘How do I afford my lifestyle?’ He depicts the human and legal elements of what it is like to deal with a broken marriage.

The film starts with Charlie and Nicole in mediation. Mediation is one of the alternative means of reaching a settlement out of court and it has several advantages.

It is often less expensive than court. In the film, legal fees play a central part and this is no different to reality. A family lawyer’s number one aim must be to try to keep the client’s costs proportionate.

It is also private. Since the incorporation of the ECHR into English law, there has been a battle between a person’s right to privacy in family proceedings and journalists’ right to freedom of expression. Although reporting restrictions can be lifted in limited circumstances, mediation is always private and it has a greater degree of flexibility. In mediation, the parties have the ability reach an agreement themselves, rather than experience the judicial equivalent of a ‘lucky dip’, when they attend court.

In ‘Marriage Story’ mediation doesn’t work out for the couple, so Nicole, instructs a shrewd lawyer, Nora Fanshaw (played by Laura Dern), to deal with their divorce.

Nicole appears to petition Charlie for divorce on the ground of “irreconcilable differences”. This is a difference between two people that makes it impossible for their marriage to continue (it is an American concept).  This means that no party is at fault, so they can divorce without having to blame each other for their separation.

This is not ground for divorce in England and Wales, despite what is often misreported in our media. This is because our system does not allow for no fault divorce. Couples must either play the ‘blame game’ or wait 2 or 5 years, depending on whether they have the other’s consent to divorce.

Although ‘Marriage Story’ is a film about a divorce case, there is a great deal of discussion about child ‘custody’. We even watch Charlie have a visit from the US equivalent of a Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) officer. These officers report to the court about each parent’s suitability as a parent.

In England and Wales there is no such thing as ‘custody’ as this is an American term. Instead we refer to Child Arrangement Orders. Such orders deal with which parent a child is to live with and when they should spend time with the other parent. There can also be shared care orders. When the court grants such orders it considers what is in the child’s best interests.

Nicole hacks Charlie’s email account and discovers that he has had an affair. It is common where one party believes that the other has cheated or is not being upfront about his/her assets for them to be tempted to hack an email account or open a confidential letter. It is vital that temptation is resisted. It is illegal and there are civil and criminal penalties that will inevitably make any divorce more stressful.

Baumbach uses lawyers to show that they can be both empowering and alienating. He shows how essential it is to find a solicitor who will devise a strategy that is in their client’s best interests. ‘Marriage Story’ shows that whilst it is important to have a lawyer with steel to back you up if needed, a constructive non-confrontational approach is sometimes the best way forward.

If you have any questions about divorce or family law, please contact a member of our Family team.

[1]https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160106011951/https://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/divorces-in-england-and-wales/2011/sty-what-percentage-of-marriages-end-in-divorce.html


Related News

Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets
Jan 18, 2021
Family Mediation Week 2021
Nov 19, 2020
Jay Patel and Polly Atkins examine family law in the lead up to Brexit in Family Law Week
Nov 09, 2020
Richard Kershaw discusses trusts on divorce and their role in financial planning strategies
Nov 05, 2020
Hunters recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.