News

Our divorce law is based on hypocrisy and a lack of intellectual honesty

  • March 29, 2017
  • By Hunters Law

The case of Tini Owens has caused an outpour of dissatisfaction in the family law world and renewed calls for reform. The Court of Appeal found that Mrs Owens failed to prove that her husband had behaved in such a way that she cannot reasonably be expected to live with him, rejecting her appeal for the right to divorce.

Mrs Owens’ petition accused her husband of prioritising his work life over his home life, not providing her with love, attention or affection, suffering from mood swings and criticising her. Mr Owens defended the petition, arguing that the allegations against him were the stuff of everyday married life and maintained that they still had a future together as a married couple.

The Court of Appeal considered the question of the unreasonableness of the respondent’s behaviour in a subjective way, looking at: (i) in the context of this marriage; (ii) looking at this wife and this husband; (iii) in the light of all the circumstances; and (iv) having regard to the cumulative effect of all the respondent’s conduct. The court then asked itself whether this husband behaved in a way that this petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with him.

The Court of Appeal was sympathetic to Judge Tolson’s examination of the case, approach to the law and his judgment, stating that Judge Tolson was entitled to find that Mrs Owens’ allegations against her husband were “anodyne” “lack[ing] beef” and “flimsy.”

The Court of Appeal did, however, have some harsh words to say about the state of the current divorce law, stating “the law the judges have to apply and the procedures which they have to follow are based on hypocrisy and lack of intellectual honesty.”

Hetty Gleave, Partner, commented:

“This decision cuts firmly across the prevailing culture of resolving disputes in a way that does not rack up the acrimony between the parties and therefore costs.  

The days of citing pages of corrosive allegations about a respondent’s behaviour in order to convince a Judge that the marriage really is over were, we hoped, long gone. Now, unless the Respondent agrees the allegations in advance, solicitors will have to tell clients that they really do have to add the extra inflammatory paragraph to “beef” it up, as the Judges put it, if they want certainty.

Divorce is an emotionally difficult and expensive process as it is. We do not need to make it worse and the case for no fault divorce must surely now gain traction from all who work in this area.”

Amy Scollan, Associate, stated:

“The shocking outcome of this case has caused outrage in the family law world, renewing and strengthening calls for reform in this outdated area of law.

The judgment has left Mrs Owens locked in a marriage where she feels isolated, alone and desperately unhappy. She will now have to wait until 2020 to divorce her husband, using a petition based on five years of separation.

Ultimately this is a dangerous judgment, which has the potential to leave the door open for more contested divorces. With the family law profession in uproar, combined with the Court of Appeal’s scathing review of divorce law, what more does the Government need to change the law? No fault divorce is long overdue.”

Related News

Aug 02, 2021
Henry Hood examines the Thwaite jurisdiction where a client seeks adjustment of a financial remedy order in The Review
Jul 29, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses what happens to the children when separated parents differ on relocating in WealthBriefing
Jul 28, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses a practical guide to emergency private children cases in The Review
Jul 27, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses what separated parents wanting to relocate within the UK need to know in Family Law Week
Jul 22, 2021
Hunters’ success in the Chambers HNW 2021 Guide
Jul 12, 2021
Jo Carr-West and Lara Barton discuss recent recommendations that would assist divorcing couples in managing the CGT implications of separating their financial affairs in Family Law Week
Jul 07, 2021
Hunters’ success in the 2021 Spear’s Family Law Index
Jun 22, 2021
Jo Carr-West and Lara Barton discuss CGT for divorcing couples in WealthBriefing’s Family Wealth Report
Jun 15, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses what separated parents must consider when wanting to relocate within the UK
Jun 10, 2021
Henry Hood and Nicole Derham discuss what separated parents should be aware of when taking their children abroad on holiday in The Times

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)