News

Matthew Yates comments on the rise of disputes over family trusts in the FT

  • October 27, 2017
  • By Hunters Law

Sibling rivalry and inter-generational bickering have driven the number of people contesting family trusts to record levels this year, according to new figures.

Lawyers say that families are often more fragmented, with divorce and remarriage routine. They are also taking squabbles over family-owned wealth to court.

Matthew Yates, a partner at law firm Hunters said cases involving trusts going to court do not always involve a claim against a fellow trustee. Claims can encompass trust administration; claims by or against trustees; disputes between trustees; disputes between beneficiaries; variation of trusts, or removing a trustee.

In spite of rising trust disputes heading to the High Court, Mr Yates said mediation could provide a cheaper way to resolve a trust conflict.

“Where there may need to be an ongoing relationship between the trustees and the beneficiaries after the disagreement has been dealt with, a non-adversarial approach could provide long-term benefits,” says Mr Yates.

“Although the court may need to rubber-stamp agreements reached between the parties after alternative dispute resolution has taken its course, those costs will be far lower than a full-blown trial, and the possibility of rebuilding relationships is far more likely.”

Experts also recommend that trustees manage beneficiaries’ expectations by giving a clue, typically written guidance, as to the person’s reasoning for creating the trust and how he or she envisaged it might be run.

Read the full article in the FT here.

Related News

Feb 09, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s First Report on Capital Gains Tax, in Private Client Business
Jan 06, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s review of Capital Gains Tax
Nov 30, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in WealthBriefing
Nov 13, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in the case of Re estate of Ellen Beatrice Brackstone [2020]
Oct 29, 2020
Julia Richards examines Section 33 of the Wills Act 1837
Oct 28, 2020
Daniel Watson examines Wills being witnessed remotely by video-link in Taxation
Sep 21, 2020
Hunters recognised as one of the 2020 eprivateclient Top Law Firms
Sep 04, 2020
Matthew Yates comments on video wills in the Financial Times
Aug 11, 2020
Daniel Watson examines the government’s newest legislation regarding Wills in Lawyer Monthly
Aug 04, 2020
Matthew Yates examines the recent change to the law of organ donation in England in STEP Journal

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.