News

Matthew Yates comments on probate fees to soar to a maximum of £6,000 in the FT, Mail Online UK and This Is Money

  • November 09, 2018
  • By Matthew Yates, Partner

The FT has reported that wealthy families face paying up to £6,000 to execute the will of a deceased relative after the government this week confirmed it was pressing ahead with reforms to probate charges.

From April 2019, a six-band probate fee structure will replace the current flat rate of £215, or £155 if estates are settled through a solicitor. The fee allows an executor to distribute a deceased person’s property and finances.

Those with estates valued between £50,000 and £300,000 will pay £250, and those with estates worth £500,000 to £1m will pay £2,500. Those with estates worth over £2m will face the maximum £6,000, a 3,770 per cent increase on the current cost.

Matthew Yates, partner at law firm Hunters Solicitors, said:

“Two years on from the last time the government tried to ratchet up Probate court fees, the Ministry of Justice is at it again. Reports suggest executors will need to pay up to £6.000 to apply for a Grant of Probate from April 2019, an increase from £155 currently if a solicitor is applying for you.

“The increase is less than that proposed in 2016 when the maximum fee would have been £20.000, but still represents a massive hike in essentially an administrative fee. The principle seems to be that more valuable estates will pay higher Probate court fees, in a bid to plug gaps in the Court Service budget. But there is no difference in the work undertaken by the Probate Registry to issue a Grant for an estate worth £100.000 compared to one worth £10.000,000.

“This is essentially a form of taxation, being proposed outside of the Budget presumably to attract less attention and scrutiny. The last attempt by government to substantially increase Probate fees  was quietly dropped last year, coincidentally just at the time Theresa May decided to call an election. However there is no likelihood of an imminent poll to allow electors to express their view.

“The government is probably banking on there being less opposition to an increase which is significantly less than they proposed in 2016. Without a concerted effort by practitioners, professional groups and the general public, the government may well be able to push this increase through.”

Read the full articles in the FT here, behind a paywall, the Mail Online UK and This Is Money.

Related News

Nov 30, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in WealthBriefing
Nov 13, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in the case of Re estate of Ellen Beatrice Brackstone [2020]
Oct 29, 2020
Julia Richards examines Section 33 of the Wills Act 1837
Oct 28, 2020
Daniel Watson examines Wills being witnessed remotely by video-link in Taxation
Sep 21, 2020
Hunters recognised as one of the 2020 eprivateclient Top Law Firms
Sep 04, 2020
Matthew Yates comments on video wills in the Financial Times
Aug 11, 2020
Daniel Watson examines the government’s newest legislation regarding Wills in Lawyer Monthly
Aug 04, 2020
Matthew Yates examines the recent change to the law of organ donation in England in STEP Journal
Jul 30, 2020
Daniel Watson and Julia Richards examine Wills to be witnessed by video link in The Times
Jul 21, 2020
Vanina Wittenburg looks at lockdown measures for probate and considers how we should work to streamline it in the future

© Hunters Law LLP 2020 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)