News

Legal Professional Privilege

  • February 07, 2013 test
  • By Hunters Law

The Supreme Court has ruled against the extension of the availability of Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) beyond members of the legal profession.

In the recent case of Prudential plc and Prudential (Gibraltar) Limited –v- Special Commissioner of Income Tax and Philip Pandolfo (HM Inspector of Taxes) [2013] UKSC 1, Prudential argued that they could not be compelled to disclose their communications because they were covered by LPP.

LPP entitles a party to withhold evidence from production to the Court or a third party in certain situations. LPP covers confidential communications between lawyers and their clients (made for the dominant purpose of seeking or giving legal advice) or communications which come into existence for the dominant purpose of being used in connection with actual or pending litigation.

The Supreme Court however refused to extend the scope of LPP to cover advice given by accountants on tax matters. The decision reinforces the existing position that only advice provided by members of the legal profession is protected by LPP where the subject matter of that advice is unconnected with litigation.

The Court was of the view that an extension of the availability of LPP was a matter for Parliament and not for the Court. It remains to be seen whether Parliament will address the issue.

Related News

Jul 12, 2017
Preventative measures to reduce the risk of potential inheritance disputes
Mar 17, 2017
Richard Kershaw comments on Ilott v Mitson Supreme Court judgment in The Times Law Brief
Dec 12, 2016
Richard Kershaw comments on Ilott v Mitson Supreme Court case in the Financial Times, Family Law Week and New Law Journal
Nov 29, 2016
Rejection to register Caffè Nero EU trademarks
Nov 08, 2016
Charities vs children: who decides?
Sep 29, 2016
A New Form Of Copyright Infringement: The Posting of Hyperlinks
Aug 23, 2016
Jamie Lester discusses the dangers of missing court deadlines in The Barrister
Jul 25, 2016
Insolvency practice: changes to look out for
May 09, 2016
Controlling the Mastermind
Apr 22, 2016
Court of Appeal considers scope of all reasonable endeavours and good faith obligations

© Hunters Law LLP 2019 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)