News

Law Commission looks at financial provision on divorce

  • September 12, 2012
  • By Hunters Law

The Law Commission has published a Consultation Paper addressing some of the issues that arise when the Court has to resolve financial arrangements on divorce.

The Law Commission is looking at how the Court determines the amount of maintenance which should be payable after a divorce, and for how long it should be paid. Under current law, it should only be paid insofar as it is required to meet “needs”, but there is no definition or consistent judicial interpretation of “need”. This makes it hard to predict what maintenance will be ordered.

One solution suggested is the use of a formula. Formulas are used in the USA and Canada, and are based upon both parties’ incomes, the length of the marriage, and the ages of any children. The Law Commission is clear that there would need to be the possibility of variation if the formula operated unfairly in a particular case.

The Paper also addresses “non-matrimonial” assets, i.e. property received by inheritance or gift, or owned before the marriage, by one party. Under the current law the presumption that assets should be shared equally does not apply to non-matrimonial assets as it does to other assets. However, the rules that do apply to non-matrimonial assets are not clearly established, and different Judges take different approaches. The Law Commission proposes that non-matrimonial assets should not be shared at all, unless that is necessary to meet the other party’s needs.

We hope the Commission’s work will result in a system that provides more certainty, but this is unlikely to happen for some time yet, as a Final Report is not due until next autumn. In the meantime, the uncertainty is contributing to an increasing number of couples using pre-nuptial or post-nuptial agreements to set out what they would want to happen to their finances in the event of divorce.

Please contact a member of our Family Team if you would like advice on any of the issues mentioned above.

Related News

Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets
Jan 18, 2021
Family Mediation Week 2021
Nov 19, 2020
Jay Patel and Polly Atkins examine family law in the lead up to Brexit in Family Law Week
Nov 09, 2020
Richard Kershaw discusses trusts on divorce and their role in financial planning strategies
Nov 05, 2020
Hunters recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)