News

Law Commission looks at financial provision on divorce

  • September 12, 2012
  • By Hunters Law

The Law Commission has published a Consultation Paper addressing some of the issues that arise when the Court has to resolve financial arrangements on divorce.

The Law Commission is looking at how the Court determines the amount of maintenance which should be payable after a divorce, and for how long it should be paid. Under current law, it should only be paid insofar as it is required to meet “needs”, but there is no definition or consistent judicial interpretation of “need”. This makes it hard to predict what maintenance will be ordered.

One solution suggested is the use of a formula. Formulas are used in the USA and Canada, and are based upon both parties’ incomes, the length of the marriage, and the ages of any children. The Law Commission is clear that there would need to be the possibility of variation if the formula operated unfairly in a particular case.

The Paper also addresses “non-matrimonial” assets, i.e. property received by inheritance or gift, or owned before the marriage, by one party. Under the current law the presumption that assets should be shared equally does not apply to non-matrimonial assets as it does to other assets. However, the rules that do apply to non-matrimonial assets are not clearly established, and different Judges take different approaches. The Law Commission proposes that non-matrimonial assets should not be shared at all, unless that is necessary to meet the other party’s needs.

We hope the Commission’s work will result in a system that provides more certainty, but this is unlikely to happen for some time yet, as a Final Report is not due until next autumn. In the meantime, the uncertainty is contributing to an increasing number of couples using pre-nuptial or post-nuptial agreements to set out what they would want to happen to their finances in the event of divorce.

Please contact a member of our Family Team if you would like advice on any of the issues mentioned above.

Related News

Apr 27, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses arrangements for divorcing couples with pets during National Pet Month
Apr 26, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether a former spouse can be required to pay rent pending the sale of the family home in STEP Journal+
Apr 22, 2021
Henry Hood comments on Tatiana Akhmedova winning a High Court lawsuit against son in £450m divorce battle in WealthBriefing
Apr 14, 2021
Jo Carr-West discusses a new approach to domestic abuse in the Family Court
Mar 30, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses family loans and divorce settlements
Mar 23, 2021
Henry Hood discusses Capitalisation of maintenance and Duxbury Calculations
Mar 17, 2021
Jo Carr-West discusses the capitalisation of child maintenance in Family Law Week
Mar 15, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses top tips for international families on divorce
Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)