News

Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in the case of Re estate of Ellen Beatrice Brackstone [2020]

  • November 13, 2020
  • By Julia Richards, Partner

This article was originally published on 13 November 2020 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary Blog, the Legal Editor of The Times, and can be accessed here

Wills often provide for a gift “to such of my children as shall survive me in equal shares”, but what happens if a child predeceases the testator leaving issue?  Do they inherit their parent’s share or do the testator’s surviving children scoop the pool?  It depends on whether section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 applies.

S.33 applies where the testator leaves a gift to a child (or remoter descendant).  If that child predeceases the testator, their own children take per stirpes, “unless a contrary intention appears by the will”.   The clearest form of contrary intention is a clause expressly excluding s.33 but what happens where a will does not contain such provision?

The question has arisen in several cases over the years with conflicting decisions.  The issue arose most recently in the case of Re estate of Ellen Beatrice Brackstone [2020] Lexis Citation 318.  Mrs Brackstone died leaving a will, which provided that her estate should pass to:

“…such of my children as shall survive me in equal shares namely [Sandra] and [David]”

Sandra predeceased her mother, leaving a daughter, Holly, who claimed that she was entitled to her mother’s share of the estate.  However, David contended that the Will excluded s.33 and that he inherited everything.

Having reviewed the case law and carefully considered the construction of the will, the judge declared that the above wording was not sufficient to exclude s.33 and, accordingly, Holly was entitled to a half share in the estate.

The case is a good reminder of the importance of clear drafting and the unwelcome consequences of ambiguity.  To ensure that the testator’s intentions are clear on the face of the will, many practitioners choose to exclude s.33 and include an express default gift, leaving no room for doubt.

Related News

May 11, 2022
Vanina Wittenburg examines the impact of the pandemic for probates and discusses hope for the future in Taxation
Apr 12, 2022
Vanina Wittenburg examines how the pandemic has affected the probate system and hope for the future in the FTAdviser
Mar 31, 2022
Vanina Wittenburg discusses the importance of wills for young adults in Today’s Wills & Probate
Mar 21, 2022
Vanina Wittenburg comments on the impact of the BVD cutting the funding of will searches, in This is Money
Feb 02, 2022
Vanina Wittenburg is a full member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP)
Jan 25, 2022
Flora Nelmes discusses the steps involved in insuring an unoccupied property following a death in Lawyer Monthly
Jan 17, 2022
Probate Application Fee Increase
Dec 13, 2021
Flora Nelmes says that clients should review their existing wills and consider IHT opportunities with the RNRB to remain fixed until April 2026 in Accountancy Daily
Dec 01, 2021
Flora Nelmes discusses the opportunities to review existing wills and explore IHT, as the residence nil rate band is to remain frozen until April 2026, in Lawyer Monthly
Oct 28, 2021
Doubling of time limit for payment of CGT on residential property transactions

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)