News

The Autumn Budget 2017

  • December 04, 2017
  • By Hunters Law

The Autumn Budget 2017

At first glance, last month’s Autumn Budget did not seem to contain much in the way of private client tax announcements. Closer examination of the detail reveals there was in fact more than met the eye – here are some that stood out.

Philip Hammond’s budget last month provided a welcome boost for first time buyers, who will have no Stamp Duty Land Tax (‘SDLT’) to pay on acquisitions up to £300,000, and SDLT at a rate of 5% on acquisitions exceeding £300,000 where the total acquisition cost is not more than £500,000. However, first time buyers for this purpose do not include buyers who have previously acquired an interest in land anywhere in the world, even if by way of inheritance, gift or distribution under a trust – meaning ‘first time owner‘ may have been a more appropriate term for the Chancellor to use.

There will be a rise in the capital gains tax annual exempt amount from £11,300 to £11,700 for individuals and personal representatives, and from £5,650 to £5,850 for trustees, whilst the income tax personal allowance increases to £11,850 and the higher rate threshold (being the sum of the personal allowance and the basic rate limit) to £46,350.

Good news for earners was offset with less good news for savers, though, with the ISA subscription limit to remain unchanged at £20,000 and the income tax starting rate limit for savings to stay at £5,000, although savers will have been buoyed by the Bank of England’s base rate rise earlier in the mont

Unsurprisingly, given recent news coverage of the so-called ‘Paradise Papers’, measures affecting non-residents were announced. These included the launch of a consultation to bring gains on all UK property owned by non-residents within the scope of UK tax, thereby widening the net from gains on residential property to include gains on commercial property too. No doubt there will be pressure on the government to do more in this area.

For more information, please contact the partner having responsibility for your affairs or any partner in the private client department here.

This article is written by James Mabey, who is an Associate at Hunters Solicitors. 

Related News

Feb 09, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s First Report on Capital Gains Tax, in Private Client Business
Jan 06, 2021
Molly Wills discusses The Office of Tax Simplification’s review of Capital Gains Tax
Nov 30, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in WealthBriefing
Nov 13, 2020
Julia Richards examines section 33 of the Wills Act 1837 in the case of Re estate of Ellen Beatrice Brackstone [2020]
Oct 29, 2020
Julia Richards examines Section 33 of the Wills Act 1837
Oct 28, 2020
Daniel Watson examines Wills being witnessed remotely by video-link in Taxation
Sep 21, 2020
Hunters recognised as one of the 2020 eprivateclient Top Law Firms
Sep 04, 2020
Matthew Yates comments on video wills in the Financial Times
Aug 11, 2020
Daniel Watson examines the government’s newest legislation regarding Wills in Lawyer Monthly
Aug 04, 2020
Matthew Yates examines the recent change to the law of organ donation in England in STEP Journal

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.