News

High Court rejects wife’s exaggerated income budget

  • March 11, 2015
  • By Hunters Law

A wife’s application for interim maintenance was rejected in the recently reported decision of BD v FD [2014] EWHC 4443 (Fam) as her interim budget significantly exceeded the standard of living of marriage.

The husband’s case was that the wife’s budget was unsustainable because it was manifestly exaggerated and unrealistic. The maintenance sought by the wife was so far in excess of the standard of living during the marriage that it was unprincipled and unreasonable. The wife’s budget had included holidays and weekend breaks; clothes, shoes and jewellery; and outings, restaurants and entertaining which bore no reflection to expenditure incurred by the family during the marriage.

Mr Justice Moylan adjudged the wife’s budget included a significant element of forensic exaggeration, and that the amount sought substantially exceeded the marital standard of living. There would need to be some specific, powerful, justification for that standard being exceeded on an interim basis. In this instance, the husband was paying the wife sufficient maintenance to enable the wife to meet her reasonable income needs for herself and the children over the next year.

Related News

Sep 21, 2022
Olivia Piercy featured in a Q&A in Today’s Family Lawyer on her career path and the areas of family law undergoing transformation
Sep 06, 2022
Constance Tait discusses maintenance and inflation in 2022
Sep 06, 2022
Hunters Law shortlisted at the Family Law Awards 2022
Sep 05, 2022
Olivia Piercy joins Hunters Law as a Partner in the Family Department
Jun 29, 2022
Hunters’ Family Department highlighted in the 2022 edition of the Spear’s Family Law Index
Jun 15, 2022
Philippa Kum and Eri Horrocks outline top tips for co-parents on agreeing arrangements for children in EPrivateClient
Jun 13, 2022
Amy Scollan and Anastassia Dimmek examine what happens to an art collection when couples divorce in Antiques Trade Gazette
Jun 08, 2022
Amy Scollan and Anastassia Dimmek discuss the distribution of artwork during divorce proceedings in EPrivateClient
May 12, 2022
Eri Horrocks examines post-separation assets in Today’s Family Lawyer
May 03, 2022
Polly Atkins reviews guidance on applications for security for costs in Family Law Journal

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)