News

High Court rejects wife’s exaggerated income budget

  • March 11, 2015
  • By Hunters Law

A wife’s application for interim maintenance was rejected in the recently reported decision of BD v FD [2014] EWHC 4443 (Fam) as her interim budget significantly exceeded the standard of living of marriage.

The husband’s case was that the wife’s budget was unsustainable because it was manifestly exaggerated and unrealistic. The maintenance sought by the wife was so far in excess of the standard of living during the marriage that it was unprincipled and unreasonable. The wife’s budget had included holidays and weekend breaks; clothes, shoes and jewellery; and outings, restaurants and entertaining which bore no reflection to expenditure incurred by the family during the marriage.

Mr Justice Moylan adjudged the wife’s budget included a significant element of forensic exaggeration, and that the amount sought substantially exceeded the marital standard of living. There would need to be some specific, powerful, justification for that standard being exceeded on an interim basis. In this instance, the husband was paying the wife sufficient maintenance to enable the wife to meet her reasonable income needs for herself and the children over the next year.

Related News

Jun 15, 2022
Philippa Kum and Eri Horrocks outline top tips for co-parents on agreeing arrangements for children in EPrivateClient
Jun 13, 2022
Amy Scollan and Anastassia Dimmek examine what happens to an art collection when couples divorce in Antiques Trade Gazette
Jun 08, 2022
Amy Scollan and Anastassia Dimmek discuss the distribution of artwork during divorce proceedings in EPrivateClient
May 12, 2022
Eri Horrocks examines post-separation assets in Today’s Family Lawyer
May 03, 2022
Polly Atkins reviews guidance on applications for security for costs in Family Law Journal
Apr 26, 2022
Eri Horrocks examines whether post-separation assets can be shared on divorce
Apr 20, 2022
Henry Hood interviewed by Nick Heath at Capital Asset Management
Apr 13, 2022
Henry Hood and Eri Horrocks discuss separation agreements and examine the case of Horohoe v Horohoe in STEP Journal
Apr 01, 2022
Jo Carr-West and Eri Horrocks discuss arbitrating relocation cases in The Review
Mar 30, 2022
Henry Hood and James Vernor-Miles share their advice with unmarried couples co-owning (or buying) property together in Tatler’s Address Book

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)