News

High Court rejects wife’s exaggerated income budget

  • March 11, 2015
  • By Hunters Law

A wife’s application for interim maintenance was rejected in the recently reported decision of BD v FD [2014] EWHC 4443 (Fam) as her interim budget significantly exceeded the standard of living of marriage.

The husband’s case was that the wife’s budget was unsustainable because it was manifestly exaggerated and unrealistic. The maintenance sought by the wife was so far in excess of the standard of living during the marriage that it was unprincipled and unreasonable. The wife’s budget had included holidays and weekend breaks; clothes, shoes and jewellery; and outings, restaurants and entertaining which bore no reflection to expenditure incurred by the family during the marriage.

Mr Justice Moylan adjudged the wife’s budget included a significant element of forensic exaggeration, and that the amount sought substantially exceeded the marital standard of living. There would need to be some specific, powerful, justification for that standard being exceeded on an interim basis. In this instance, the husband was paying the wife sufficient maintenance to enable the wife to meet her reasonable income needs for herself and the children over the next year.

Related News

Apr 09, 2019
Henry Hood comments on the no-fault divorce reform in The Guardian
Apr 05, 2019
Jo Carr-West comments on a £1.3m divorce award despite signing a pre-nuptial agreement in Family Law Week
Apr 04, 2019
Richard Kershaw examines the case of Daga v Bangur and trusts in the Family Division in WealthBriefing
Apr 04, 2019
Rebecca Christie comments on the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths Act 2019 that came into force in The Times
Mar 07, 2019
Richard Kershaw comments on the case of Cowan v Foreman in New Law Journal
Mar 04, 2019
Richard Kershaw examines the case of Daga v Bangur and trusts in the Family Division in Family Law LexisNexis
Feb 06, 2019
Hazel Wright reaccredited by the Family Mediation Council as a specialist family mediator
Dec 17, 2018
Henry Hood comments on the sale of the £4.5 million helicopter in the Akhmedova divorce case in Family Law Week
Nov 23, 2018
Jay Patel comments on a racing driver’s ex-wife’s possible entitlement to a £5 million divorce settlement in Family Law
Nov 09, 2018
Henry Hood comments on Sharia court ignoring an order from the High Court that an oligarch must hand over a £350m yacht to his ex-wife in The Law Society Gazette and Family Law Week

© Hunters Law LLP 2019 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)