News

Hetty Gleave discusses Asif Aziz divorce case in Metro, Irish Examiner and Family Law Week

  • October 06, 2017
  • By Hetty Gleave, Partner

Asif Aziz, said to be a billionaire London property developer, has claimed that he was never married to Tagilde Aziz who is claiming a share of £1.1 billion in financial remedy proceedings in the High Court.

Mr Aziz seeks to have reversed a decree nisi pronounced in 2016 on the basis that a Muslim marriage ceremony, claimed to have taken place in Malawi in 2002, had never actually occurred.

Hetty Gleave, Partner at Hunters Solicitors, commented:

“Ever since Mick Jagger told Jerry Hall that after 21 years believing she was his wife and four children later, they were never actually married, there has been a high level of public interest in how a marriage is legally defined as valid.

“Cases where the validity of a marriage is called into question usually involve a marriage ceremony overseas, where the correct formalities have not been complied with.

“The question is whether the law of the country in which the marriage was celebrated declares the marriage invalid, in which case an English court will too. However, this is not the end of the matter.

“The person who seeks financial relief after an invalid marriage may still be able to apply for a decree of nullity, rather than divorce. The purpose of a nullity petition is to ensure that where the parties intended to be married and attended a ceremony which had all the hallmarks of marriage, but the process was in some way flawed, the affected party could still obtain financial relief from the court, as though they had been legally married.

“Therefore, even if Mr Aziz is successful in proving that his marriage was not recognised in Malawi, and so is invalid in this country, he should not assume that Mrs Aziz is not entitled to any financial relief. As long as she has sufficient evidence after 15 years to show that they both intended to be married and lived their life as man and wife, then her financial claims against him remain open.

“It would be a cold hearted Judge who did not look with tender sympathy on such an applicant after such a long relationship and four children. Malawi wedding or not, Mr Aziz should not think that he is out of the legal jungle just yet.”

Read the full article in Metro, Irish Examiner and Family Law Week

Related News

Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets
Jan 18, 2021
Family Mediation Week 2021
Nov 19, 2020
Jay Patel and Polly Atkins examine family law in the lead up to Brexit in Family Law Week
Nov 09, 2020
Richard Kershaw discusses trusts on divorce and their role in financial planning strategies
Nov 05, 2020
Hunters recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.