Henry Hood discusses divorce in England and English expats

  • November 08, 2021
  • By Henry Hood, Senior Partner

Can English expats divorce in England? 

The English Family Court is known for making more generous financial orders on divorce than many other jurisdictions. For that reason, many English expats seeking financial provision on divorce are keen to have their divorce proceedings take place in England (and expats defending such claims are often keen to avoid this).

The circumstances in which the Family Court in England is able to hear a case brought by an English expat, and which aspects of the case it will be able to rule on, have been significantly impacted by Brexit.

Since the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020, the requirements for initiating divorce proceedings in England have been relaxed. It is now possible to apply for divorce in England, and have all financial claims determined by the English courts, on the basis that either you or your spouse is “domiciled” in England and Wales – even if the other is not and even if neither of you live there.

The law on domicile is not straightforward, but broadly speaking a person is domiciled in the place where they consider their permanent home to be, even if they have not lived there for some time. A person can only have one domicile, and it will only change if they move country and intend to remain there permanently or indefinitely. This means that many English expats remain domiciled in England.

Previously the domicile of one party was insufficient to enable the English courts to hear the case if there was a closer connection with an EU state. Even if that was not the case, and the divorce proceedings could take place in England based on one party’s domicile, the court could not deal with “maintenance” aspects of the financial claim – it would be restricted to dealing with the sharing of marital assets and unable to make additional provision for the applicant’s needs, either by way of a capital sum or ongoing maintenance payments. This often undermined the benefits of bringing divorce proceedings in England.

Since 1 January 2021, anyone who is domiciled in England, or whose spouse is domiciled in England, can bring divorce proceedings here, irrespective of their connections with other countries, and can then have all aspects of the financial arrangements determined by the English court.

However, there are some complications. Firstly, starting divorce proceedings in England does not guarantee the case will continue here if the parties have a close connection with another country. If the other spouse issues divorce proceedings in a different country, the English court will decide whether to hear the case based on the principle of “forum conveniens”. The court will consider in which jurisdiction it is more appropriate for the case to be heard taking into account the parties’ connections with each of the competing jurisdictions.

Issues of enforcement must also be considered. Obtaining an English order may be a pyrrhic victory if most of the parties’ assets are in a jurisdiction which will not enforce an English order. A particular issue is that the relevant international convention, the 2007 Hague Convention on International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance, may not cover orders made within a divorce case proceeding in England on the basis of one party’s domicile. Much will depend on the law of the jurisdiction where the assets are located.

It’s also important to note that some foreign jurisdictions will not recognise as valid a divorce made in England on the basis of one party’s domicile.

Whether divorce proceedings and the consequential financial claims can be – and if so should be – brought in England remains complex following the end of the Brexit transition period. However, there is now more flexibility and opportunity to have cases heard here, and early specialist advice is essential.

For advice on any of the issues raised please contact Henry Hood on 020 7412 0050 or

Related News

Feb 14, 2024
Henry Hood and Anna Roiser examine the new transparency pilot in the family court
Feb 09, 2024
Henry Hood and Anna Roiser discuss the transparency reporting pilot for financial remedy proceedings in eprivateclient
Feb 08, 2024
Olivia Piercy and Henry Hood explore the intersection between LSPOs and economic abuse in Financial Remedies Journal
Feb 08, 2024
Olivia Piercy and Anita Mehta consider abuse in divorce settlements in Today’s Family Lawyer
Jan 31, 2024
Richard Kershaw comments on the Supreme Court judgment in Potanina v Potanin
Jan 16, 2024
Henry Hood recognised in eprivateclient’s ’50 Most Influential’ 2024
Dec 19, 2023
Hunters’ Family team celebrates pro-bono successes and expands commitment
Dec 01, 2023
Hunters shortlisted at the British Family Law Awards 2024
Nov 24, 2023
Can you use the same solicitor for a divorce in England?
Oct 27, 2023
Olivia Piercy calls to review the law on ‘conduct’ in financial remedy cases in the Financial Remedies Journal


© Hunters Law LLP 2024 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)