News

Henry Hood comments on Russian Oligarch’s £453 million divorce in The Law Society Gazette

  • March 01, 2018
  • By Hunters Law

Another Russian oligarch was in court this week, claiming that he could “not get justice in Britain”. Farkhad Akhmedov, 61, was determined to keep his £453 million fortune out of the reach of his former wife, Tatiana, but the Court of Appeal judges on Tuesday, 28 February agreed that his solicitor was rightly ordered to disclose that the businessman’s £90 million art collection was held by “entities in Liechtenstein”.

Partner and Head of the Family department, Henry Hood, commented:

The Court of Appeal was not considering the original (coruscating) judgment against the husband that he pay £453m to his wife, but the subsequent order against his solicitor to reveal communications with third parties concerning the specific assets, which the High Court had ordered to be transferred to the wife to meet it. 

“The resulting disclosure in an oral examination by Nigel Dyer QC (well known for his particular expertise in enforcement) showing that the relevant assets had been moved (inter alia) to Lichtenstein just before trial, was never going to assist the husband’s cause. The solicitor contended that the order against him breached the overarching principle of Legal Professional Privilege (LPP). This was rejected by the Court on several grounds. Nigel Dyer QC had been careful to limit his enquiries to administrative arrangements made with third parties (not the client) concerning the assets, such as insurance. Accordingly, the Court decided that the communications did not attract the privilege in the first place, being neither with the husband, nor amounting to legal advice.

“The Court also found that, at the time of the relevant communications, the solicitor was not acting as a legal advisor but as the husband’s “man of business”. This meant that there was not the relevant legal context for the privilege even to arise. Consequently, the Court did not need to decide if the fraud exception to LPP applied. Munby LJ’s comments suggest that it would have done had the need existed.

Read the full article in The Law Society Gazette here.

Related News

Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets
Jan 18, 2021
Family Mediation Week 2021
Nov 19, 2020
Jay Patel and Polly Atkins examine family law in the lead up to Brexit in Family Law Week
Nov 09, 2020
Richard Kershaw discusses trusts on divorce and their role in financial planning strategies
Nov 05, 2020
Hunters recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)