News

Hazel Wright’s article examining the benefits of mediation in Solicitors Journal

  • October 19, 2016
  • By Hunters Law

Family mediation: The depressingly low take-up

In July 2016 the Ministry of Justice released figures for the preliminary mediation information and assessment meetings (MIAMs), which have to be attended (with very few exemptions) by all who want to use the family courts to resolve disputes on separation over children or money. Of the 20,693 applications in the first quarter of 2016, fewer than half of the applications contained a completed certificate about MIAMs. It is unlikely that all uncompleted forms were from applicants exempt from this certificate (reasons include domestic violence, involvement of Social Services in welfare issues, at least one of the couple lives abroad).

Attendance at mediation should not be compulsory. The voluntary and consensual nature that underpins the success of the process. For money cases, a mediator who also practices as a solicitor can make a huge difference. Clients are entitled to have legal information when considering issues such as transferring a home, sharing a pension.

Receipt of information about mediation should be compulsory for all in the family courts, with no exemptions. Judges could refuse to proceed with a case unless they know this has been done, not least on the basis of “proportionality” which test includes the use of court time.

Particularly where children are involved, specialist therapeutic services save long-lasting emotional wear and tear, as well as precious court resources. Tavistock Relationships’ recent ground-breaking work with CAFCASS “Parents In Dispute” helped 30 families with a combined total of 2,613 weeks (50.25 years) in court. The longest case had been using court time for 358 weeks.

Relation Hubs, a local resource for all separating families, could offer mediation and therapeutic services, without any perceived stigma which can be attached to out of court dispute resolution as a soft option.

Mediation fits the current zeitgeist for self-autonomy (for example the growth of prenups, and businesses such as Uber and Air B’n’B) where individuals work things out for themselves.

How many mediators does it take to change a light bulb? None, the couple do it for themselves.

This article was originally published in Solicitors Journal, and can be found here.

Hazel Wright 

Partner, Hunters incorporating May, May & Merrimans.

Related News

Nov 29, 2022
Resolution’s Good Divorce Week 2022
Nov 24, 2022
Richard Kershaw participates in Today’s Family Lawyer Podcast
Nov 03, 2022
Hunters Law is recognised in The Times’ Best Law Firms 2023
Nov 01, 2022
Olivia Piercy discusses financial abuse in HNW divorces in the FTAdviser
Oct 21, 2022
Olivia Piercy participates in Today’s Family Lawyer Podcast
Oct 20, 2022
Richard Kershaw examines the recent multi-million pound divorce proceedings in the case of SA v FA in EPrivateClient
Oct 20, 2022
Olivia Piercy examines tougher measurers for perpetrators of domestic abuse in The Times
Oct 19, 2022
Henry Hood comments on how high-net-worth spouses are using crypto assets in the midst of a divorce in Tatler
Oct 18, 2022
Henry Hood examines the recent judgment in X v Y [2022] and the danger of fraudulent manipulation of digital documents in ThoughtLeaders4 HNW Divorce
Oct 10, 2022
Eri Horrocks discusses the risk of imprisonment for failing to pay divorce settlements

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)