News

Hazel Wright discusses the High Court’s Islamic marriage ruling in The Times

  • August 07, 2018
  • By Hazel Wright, Partner

Islamic marriage ruling reflects modern family values

Partner in the Family department, Hazel Wright, writes that a recognition that Muslim weddings infer financial responsibilities on spouses will bring comfort to many.

The attorney-general rarely intervenes in divorce cases, but the High Court hearing last week involving Nasreen Akhter and Mohammed Shabaz Khan was one of the exceptions.

The state has a direct interest in the certainty of marriage, not least because many laws give preference to married couples who enjoy tax concessions and other benefits.

Ms Akhter, a solicitor, and Mr Khan, a businessman, are both Muslims. They had an Islamic wedding ceremony but unlike many people they did not go on to have a civil ceremony.

They then lived as a married couple for 18 years and had four children, but the relationship broke down and Ms Akhter asked the court for a divorce.

Mr Justice Williams had to decide first whether they had a valid marriage for legal purposes. If not, did they either have a non-marriage — a so-called common law marriage with no financial links as spouses — or a void marriage, where the consequent decree of nullity allows the partners to make financial claims just as they would on divorce from a valid marriage?

For clarity, the judge explained: “What this case is not about … is whether an Islamic marriage ceremony (a Nikah) should be treated as creating a valid marriage in English law.”

Unlike rabbis, vicars and some other celebrants, imams are not licensed to conduct weddings that comply with the requirements of a valid marriage in English law. The independent review of Sharia councils has recently recommended wider publicity for this situation.

But in this case, Ms Akhter knew that they needed to have their relationship registered in a civil ceremony as well as having the faith-based ceremony that is so important to many. The judge decided that Mr Khan did too, but he had repeatedly refused.

The lengthy judgment carefully considered a wide range of law and statues, including the European Convention on Human Rights. The judge considered that fundamental human rights law helped him in this case as he ruled that the marriage fell within the scope of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 in that it set out to be a lawful marriage and bore all the hallmarks of marriage. However, because it was not registered, it did not constitute a valid marriage under English law.

The judge concluded that for this couple, in their particular circumstances and based on specific facts, this was a void marriage, leading to a decree of nullity, as opposed to a non-marriage. His decision incorporated a “slightly more flexible interpretation” of the law. And that is at least a nod to the changes in family life of modern times.

The ruling is a welcome shift that may give some comfort to those couples who engage in a Sharia marriage that to all external appearances looks like a public wedding ceremony, but, as here, is invalid. In Ms Akhter’s case, it also means that she can proceed with financial claims in the family courts.

This article appeared in The Times and be read online here.


Related News

Sep 21, 2022
Olivia Piercy featured in a Q&A in Today’s Family Lawyer on her career path and the areas of family law undergoing transformation
Sep 06, 2022
Constance Tait discusses maintenance and inflation in 2022
Sep 06, 2022
Hunters Law shortlisted at the Family Law Awards 2022
Sep 05, 2022
Olivia Piercy joins Hunters Law as a Partner in the Family Department
Jun 29, 2022
Hunters’ Family Department highlighted in the 2022 edition of the Spear’s Family Law Index
Jun 15, 2022
Philippa Kum and Eri Horrocks outline top tips for co-parents on agreeing arrangements for children in EPrivateClient
Jun 13, 2022
Amy Scollan and Anastassia Dimmek examine what happens to an art collection when couples divorce in Antiques Trade Gazette
Jun 08, 2022
Amy Scollan and Anastassia Dimmek discuss the distribution of artwork during divorce proceedings in EPrivateClient
May 12, 2022
Eri Horrocks examines post-separation assets in Today’s Family Lawyer
May 03, 2022
Polly Atkins reviews guidance on applications for security for costs in Family Law Journal

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)