News

Hazel Wright discusses the benefits of mediation during Family Mediation Week in Solicitors Journal

  • January 23, 2017
  • By Hunters Law

Family mediation: making the process mainstream

Mediation in family disputes has gradually become a formal part of the process since it was made a requirement in 1997 for legal aid-funded private law cases. In 2011, a new pre-action protocol set out an expectation that all parties to divorce proceedings, whether represented or not, would attend a mediation information assessment meeting (MIAM). The move was part of the government’s drive to divert cases from court, embodying the general mood for faster and more cost-efficient dispute resolution processes.

Now, under the Children and Families Act 2014, no private law case can proceed to court unless the parties have considered mediation – unless it involves children or there are abuse allegations, both of which are exempted.

“There needs to be a general education programme to make people realise mediation is more effective than a court order in dealing with practical everyday issues such as who’s picking the kids up from school,” comments Hazel Wright, a Partner and mediator at Hunters.

An easy fix to start with would be to rewrite the divorce petition, says Wright. “It doesn’t say anything about mediation or alternatives to the court-based process. That would help; it’s the biggest flaw in the system.”

Wright suggests that formalising the process further would be counter-productive, if not unworkable. “Judges shouldn’t be authorised to challenge MIAMs – to start with, what would they challenge and on what grounds? There’s also a problem with confidentiality, and mediation really only works if it’s voluntary and confidential,” she says. “All the judge could do is impose it halfway through, as a gatekeeper. Although the judge has no legal authority, that could help steer back onto the mediation track a lot of cases that have been hurried into court and have missed a proper MIAM stage at the beginning.”

“There can be a court hearing where disclosure takes place, and at that point the judge could say that there will be no further hearing and no more court time until there has been a full assessment meeting,” Wright says. “Things could progress much more quickly if this was ingrained in the procedure at every possible stage.”

“It won’t be long before family mediators start offering fixed-fee worth,” Wright posits. “Paying, say £1,500 for fixed-fee mediation would make people take notice of MIAMs in a way that statistics tell us they haven’t.”

Wright also says that solicitors coming through the ranks now shouldn’t be allowed to practise without being trained as mediators. “It’s not just about disputes but it’s about family relationships; the idea is to think not in terms of conflict but in terms of resolving differences.”

Developing lawyer-assisted mediation, where the parties agree to mediate but each remains represented by their solicitor, is another way of gradually squaring the circle. There is no set format yet, but it is becoming a popular choice, according to Wright. “It can be very effective, especially if it’s coming halfway through. You can also bring in experts such as IFAs, for instance, to discuss pensions.”

Read the full article, in Solicitors Journal via a PDF, here.

Related News

Jan 20, 2022
Henry Hood interviewed by Citywealth
Jan 17, 2022
Family Mediation Week: Nicole Derham discusses qualifying as a family law mediator
Jan 17, 2022
Henry Hood discusses how divorce settlements can be influenced by personal asset management during a marriage in STEP Journal Plus
Dec 30, 2021
Henry Hood comments on the highest post-divorce financial settlement awarded by an English court in New Law Journal
Dec 21, 2021
Henry Hood and Eri Horrocks discuss the consequences of failing to make a payment under a court-ordered divorce settlement in EPrivateClient
Dec 15, 2021
Henry Hood and Anna Roiser examine privacy and transparency in financial proceedings on divorce
Dec 10, 2021
Henry Hood comments on Frederick Barclay faces a possible prison sentence after failing to pay a £50m divorce settlement in The Legal Diary
Dec 03, 2021
Philippa Kum discusses arrangements for children of separated parents over the Christmas holidays
Nov 26, 2021
Henry Hood examines the case of WX v HX [2021] EWHC 241 and divorce settlements in EPrivateClient
Nov 25, 2021
Henry Hood awarded Family Law Partner of the Year at the Family Law Awards 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)