News

Hazel Wright discusses the benefits of mediation during Family Mediation Week in Solicitors Journal

  • January 23, 2017
  • By Hunters Law

Family mediation: making the process mainstream

Mediation in family disputes has gradually become a formal part of the process since it was made a requirement in 1997 for legal aid-funded private law cases. In 2011, a new pre-action protocol set out an expectation that all parties to divorce proceedings, whether represented or not, would attend a mediation information assessment meeting (MIAM). The move was part of the government’s drive to divert cases from court, embodying the general mood for faster and more cost-efficient dispute resolution processes.

Now, under the Children and Families Act 2014, no private law case can proceed to court unless the parties have considered mediation – unless it involves children or there are abuse allegations, both of which are exempted.

“There needs to be a general education programme to make people realise mediation is more effective than a court order in dealing with practical everyday issues such as who’s picking the kids up from school,” comments Hazel Wright, a Partner and mediator at Hunters.

An easy fix to start with would be to rewrite the divorce petition, says Wright. “It doesn’t say anything about mediation or alternatives to the court-based process. That would help; it’s the biggest flaw in the system.”

Wright suggests that formalising the process further would be counter-productive, if not unworkable. “Judges shouldn’t be authorised to challenge MIAMs – to start with, what would they challenge and on what grounds? There’s also a problem with confidentiality, and mediation really only works if it’s voluntary and confidential,” she says. “All the judge could do is impose it halfway through, as a gatekeeper. Although the judge has no legal authority, that could help steer back onto the mediation track a lot of cases that have been hurried into court and have missed a proper MIAM stage at the beginning.”

“There can be a court hearing where disclosure takes place, and at that point the judge could say that there will be no further hearing and no more court time until there has been a full assessment meeting,” Wright says. “Things could progress much more quickly if this was ingrained in the procedure at every possible stage.”

“It won’t be long before family mediators start offering fixed-fee worth,” Wright posits. “Paying, say £1,500 for fixed-fee mediation would make people take notice of MIAMs in a way that statistics tell us they haven’t.”

Wright also says that solicitors coming through the ranks now shouldn’t be allowed to practise without being trained as mediators. “It’s not just about disputes but it’s about family relationships; the idea is to think not in terms of conflict but in terms of resolving differences.”

Developing lawyer-assisted mediation, where the parties agree to mediate but each remains represented by their solicitor, is another way of gradually squaring the circle. There is no set format yet, but it is becoming a popular choice, according to Wright. “It can be very effective, especially if it’s coming halfway through. You can also bring in experts such as IFAs, for instance, to discuss pensions.”

Read the full article, in Solicitors Journal via a PDF, here.

Related News

Apr 09, 2019
Henry Hood comments on the no-fault divorce reform in The Guardian
Apr 05, 2019
Jo Carr-West comments on a £1.3m divorce award despite signing a pre-nuptial agreement in Family Law Week
Apr 04, 2019
Richard Kershaw examines the case of Daga v Bangur and trusts in the Family Division in WealthBriefing
Apr 04, 2019
Rebecca Christie comments on the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths Act 2019 that came into force in The Times
Mar 07, 2019
Richard Kershaw comments on the case of Cowan v Foreman in New Law Journal
Mar 04, 2019
Richard Kershaw examines the case of Daga v Bangur and trusts in the Family Division in Family Law LexisNexis
Feb 06, 2019
Hazel Wright reaccredited by the Family Mediation Council as a specialist family mediator
Dec 17, 2018
Henry Hood comments on the sale of the £4.5 million helicopter in the Akhmedova divorce case in Family Law Week
Nov 23, 2018
Jay Patel comments on a racing driver’s ex-wife’s possible entitlement to a £5 million divorce settlement in Family Law
Nov 09, 2018
Henry Hood comments on Sharia court ignoring an order from the High Court that an oligarch must hand over a £350m yacht to his ex-wife in The Law Society Gazette and Family Law Week

© Hunters Law LLP 2019 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)