News

Harriet Murray explores the implications of paying for the pandemic with a wealth tax in Lawyer Monthly

  • August 02, 2021
  • By Harriet Murray, Senior Associate

This article was originally published in Lawyer Monthly and can be accessed here

Paying for the pandemic with a wealth tax

Prompted by the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 crisis, in April 2020 a Wealth Tax Commission was established. It was comprised of two academics and a barrister with the objective of assessing whether a wealth tax would be desirable and deliverable in the UK.  Their aim was “to provide policy makers with a solid evidence base” and “to deliver the first in-depth analysis of a wealth tax in the UK for almost half a century”.

The Wealth Tax Commission worked with international experts including tax practitioners, economists and lawyers in order to study all aspects of a wealth tax including “issues of both principle and practice”, and acknowledged funding from the Economic and Social Research Council through the CAGE at Warwick and a COVID-19 Rapid Response Grant, and also a grant from Atlantic Fellows for Social and Economic Equity’s COVID-19 Rapid Response Fund.

Some key recommendations were:

  • Should the Government choose to raise taxes following the COVID-19 pandemic, a one-off wealth tax would raise significant revenue in a fair and efficient way. It would be very difficult to avoid and in practice would work without successive administrative cost.
  • An annual wealth tax would be more difficult to deliver effectively than a one-off wealth tax. Instead, the recommendation was for “major structural reform” of existing taxes on wealth.
  • The one-off wealth tax would be assessed on the open market value of the individual assets on a given date (including main residence and pensions) net of any debts; would be payable on wealth above a certain threshold; and the tax payable in instalments over five years.
  • A date for determining the value for an individual’s wealth would be fixed on or shortly before the announcement of the wealth tax.
  • There would be an option for couples to be assessed jointly, with a combined allowance.
  • Assets held in trust would be taxed by reference to the residence of the settlor of the trust (liability attributable to the trust fund would primarily fall upon the trustees and only secondarily on the settlor). If the settlor was not resident for wealth tax purposes on the assessment date, then the trust would only be liable if a beneficiary was resident, or to the extent that the trust holds UK-sited assets that are chargeable on non-residents.

Who would pay the wealth tax?

It would be payable by anyone resident in the UK for more than four out of the previous seven years, including anyone claiming the status of a “non-dom”.

Non-residents would pay the wealth tax on any houses and land owned in the UK whether they own it directly or through trusts or companies.

The Wealth Tax Commission did not recommend extending the tax to other assets owned by non-residents except perhaps foreign controlling shareholdings of UK private companies.

Threshold and rates

The Wealth Tax Commission does not make any recommendations on setting thresholds or rates for the wealth tax, since it is their view that this is a decision for politicians.  However, the report contains illustrations of potential thresholds and rates, including that of a 5% rate (taxed as an annualised rate of 1% over five years) applied to a series of personal wealth thresholds ranging from £250,000 to £10 million.

A separate report from the Wealth Tax Commission gives detailed modelling of how much could be raised by a wealth tax, and from whom, at different rates and thresholds.

A one-off wealth tax on all individual net worth above £500,000, for example, and charged at 1% a year for five years would raise £260 billion.

By contrast, at a threshold of £2 million it would raise £80 billion.

As part of these illustrations, the Wealth Tax Commission clarifies that a wealth tax levied at 1% above £500,000 would require a couple to have net wealth exceeding £1 million before any wealth tax would be payable.

Would there be any exceptions to paying the wealth tax?

The Wealth Tax Commission has suggested that if, after an assessment date for the wealth tax has been fixed, someone suffers a drastic fall in their wealth for reasons outside of their control, that it would be possible to provide some relief against the tax due.

If an individual genuinely could not pay the tax out of income and savings over the standard period payment of five years, then a “statutory deferral scheme” would apply so the tax could be deferred until there were sufficient liquid funds available.

In the report there is also a tentative suggestion of an indefinite deferral where a person’s wealth tax bill was more than 10% of the combined total of net income (after all other taxes) and their liquid assets.

Would any assets be exempt?

The Wealth Tax Commission cites four reasons for taxing all assets (horizontal fairness, vertical fairness, revenue, and avoidance) but recommend that there should be an exemption for any single items worth less than £3,000 to avoid unnecessary valuations and make filing simpler. It would also mean that for most individuals there would be no need to value any of their ordinary household possessions.

Would the wealth tax be a one-off?

The Wealth Tax Commission suggests a one-off wealth tax arguing that it would be better for the economy than rises in VAT, income tax or National Insurance Contributions.

Why not reform other taxes on wealth?

The Wealth Tax Commission’s recommendation for a one-off wealth tax, they explain, is an exceptional response to a specific crisis with the aim of raising revenue “without discouraging work or spending”. They acknowledge it would not fix the existing problems with inheritance tax, income tax on investment income, council tax or capital gains tax so they recommend that there should be reform of existing taxes on wealth as well.

Related News

Sep 21, 2021
Harriet Murray examines whether a wealth tax is the way to pay for the pandemic in Accountancy Daily
Sep 20, 2021
Louise Garrett discusses the proposed increase in probate fees in WealthBriefing
Sep 17, 2021
Molly Wills discusses Lasting Power of Attorneys in Hamilton George Care
Sep 15, 2021
Daniel Watson examines the pros and cons of vulnerable beneficiary trusts in EPrivateClient
Sep 07, 2021
Louise Garrett examines the MoJ’s open consultation regarding the fees for grants of probate in EPrivateClient
Aug 17, 2021
Daniel Watson examines the Law Commission’s call for evidence on possible reform of the legal treatment of crypto-assets and digital assets in England and Wales in EPrivateClient
Aug 11, 2021
Louise Garrett examines the news that the Ministry of Justice is seeking to increase probate fees in Lawyer Monthly
Jul 22, 2021
Hunters’ success in the Chambers HNW 2021 Guide
Jul 19, 2021
Daniel Watson examines the Law Commission’s proposal for reform of the Wills Act 1837 in EPrivateClient
Jul 15, 2021
Flora Nelmes examines why a solicitor should be used for probate

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)