News

Gregor Kleinknecht discusses fake news in Discover Germany

  • August 30, 2018
  • By Gregor Kleinknecht, Partner

The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth

Two things caught my eye the other week: first, Twitter made the headlines because of its failure to ban an American conspiracy theorist from its platform, whose latest phantasm was a claim that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a giant hoax. Allegedly, Twitter could not identify any infringements o1 its rules. (No — unfortunately, this is not fake news). Other tech giants, including YouTube and Facebook, had made at least a half-hearted attempt at deleting the most egregious examples of his rankings. Secondly, Michiko Kakutani, a Pulitzer Prize-winning literary critic and formerly of the New York Times, published a book rather aptly entitled The Death of Truth, in which she endeavors to explore how truth became an endangered species.

The fact that politicians use lies and deliberate disinformation as tools for seeking or maintaining power is nothing new: during the Cold War, this was called propaganda, and who can forget Iraq’s infamous but non-existent weapons of mass destruction? This carries on today on both sides of the Atlantic and, no, I will not mention Brexit or the sides of busses in this context. What is new is the way in which social media has allowed lies and disinformation to be spread without the filter mechanism of an editorial function that pays some form of regard to factuality, science, ethics, integrity, decency and shared societal values. George Orwell and Aldous Huxley would turn in their graves at the thought of their worst dystopian fears very fast becoming a 21st century reality.

Technology companies face a balancing act and will often be accused of censorship and of eroding freedom of expression when they try to act on take-down requests citing hate speech. I disagree with both allegations as a reason for inaction. The German constitution had the foresight against the experience of history to get this right when it enshrined the principle of the wehrhafte Demokratie: democratic societies are entitled to defend themselves against those who seek to undermine them. What happens if they fail to do so is aptly highlighted in another new book by Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, entitled How Democracies Die:  What History Reveals About Our Future.

Looking on the bright side, momentum is clearly gathering behind the realisation that the direction in which we are going as an information society is not acceptable as the new normal. Here in the UK, the House of Commons DCMS Committee has published an interim report on disinformation and fake news. The report’s recommendations to government include placing greater legal liability on technology companies for harmful and illegal content, including as to material that they should have been able to identify as problematic. The report further suggests that a new category of tech company should be recognised that is more than an online platform (a term which implies that the platform operator bears no responsibility for content and behind which tech companies therefore love to hide), even if this falls somewhat short of making them a publisher in the traditional sense. And there is the suggestion that a global code of ethics for social media should be agreed and a set of standards introduced to indicate the level of verification of news on a website.

In the meantime, the EU has also been active and, following a recent European Commission consultation and report on fake news and online Misinformation, in July 2018, a working group published a first draft of an EU Code of Practice to tackle online disinformation. The final version of the Code of Practice is expected by the end of September 2015. It remains to be seen whether self-regulation is the answer to the problem but I am glad already that there is a consensus now that we have a problem that needs to be resolved through more transparency, diversity and accountability, and that it is time that we set rules and boundaries for tech companies and not the other way around.

This article was published in Discover Germany in the September 2018 issue. 

Related News

Jul 22, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Constance Tait examine the impact on trademark litigation and provide 10 tips on navigating the post-Brexit era in Managing IP
Jul 16, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Anastassia Dimmek examine the growing threat of zombie firms in Lawyer Monthly
Jul 07, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine a report suggesting that firms with targeted support for ethnic minority workers see benefits
Jun 28, 2021
Richard Baxter discusses UK-EU Data Protection and how adequacy decisions avoid imminent disruption to data flows
Jun 23, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine the recent Burnell v Trans-Tag Ltd case in the High Court
Jun 22, 2021
Anastassia Dimmek discussed the key challenges of protecting clients’ healthy businesses from zombie firms in a webinar hosted by Advoselect
Jun 18, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait discuss the looming annual returns deadline for employee share schemes
May 18, 2021
Hunters hosted the Withdrawal and The Trade Marks Act 1994 webinar
Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)