News

Flood Searches and flood risk – an update

  • August 26, 2014
  • By Hunters Law

One in six properties are said to be at risk of some type of flooding; and over half of those are at risk of surface water flooding. In the light of changes in the flood insurance market (and mortgage lenders’ standard requirements) it is essential to know the potential risk to your property.

In the past flood risk has often been overlooked unless there has been recent active flooding or the property is located in an area known or likely to be prone to flooding.  If a property is at risk of flooding it may be difficult to: obtain a mortgage, obtain suitable insurance cover, or even sell the property because the marketability and the value of the property may be adversely affected.

The market for flood insurance has been undergoing major change and the insurance industry are trying to move towards a risk-based pricing structure in which each insurer would decide for itself which types of property it wants to insure and how much it will want to charge.  The insurance companies may also add a higher excess to the policy or they may insist that conditions are placed on the policy requiring flood protection measures to be taken if cover is to be maintained; such measures can be very expensive. Therefore, insurance is likely to become more expensive for properties at risk and properties with a high risk may even be uninsurable.

In light of the above it is vital that adequate due diligence is carried out and, save in exceptional circumstances, we would recommend obtaining a Flood Search when purchasing a property.  These are now readily available and provide an indication as to whether there is a low, medium or high risk of flooding. The report should include information on coastal and river flood risk, surface water (pluvial) flood risk and ground water flood risk; as well as risks from more unusual sources such as flood storage areas. The reports are inexpensive and provide valuable information. For the moment, they also confirm whether or not insurance cover is likely to be readily available; although we would always recommend you obtain formal quotes regardless.

If you would like advice on any aspect of property law, please contact the partner at Hunters having responsibility for your legal matters, or (for new enquiries) please contact a member of our Property team.

Related News

Feb 08, 2021
Peter Robinson discusses Indexation Based Rent Reviews
Jan 19, 2021
Peter Robinson comments on what new and existing landlords need to know in RBS HomeWise
Jan 04, 2021
Peter Robinson discusses The Supreme Court’s decision in Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd
Dec 11, 2020
Hunters retains Law Society’s Conveyancing Quality Scheme accreditation
Nov 12, 2020
Peter Robinson examines the government’s ban on evictions of commercial tenants during the pandemic and what commercial landlords should consider in The Law Society
Nov 12, 2020
Ben Gurluk comments on the Stamp Duty holiday in the Daily Express
Oct 30, 2020
Peter Robinson examines a recent Supreme Court case that is relevant for property investors in the challenging environment of the retail property market in Lawyer Monthly
Oct 22, 2020
Peter Robinson analyses the government’s extension of moratorium on eviction in New Law Journal
Oct 16, 2020
Peter Robinson examines the economic consequences of COVID-19 for commercial landlords in Property Industry Eye
Oct 16, 2020
Peter Robinson discusses UK property investors facing particular pressures during the pandemic in Property Week

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.