News

Hetty Gleave discusses financial settlements during Coronavirus

  • March 26, 2020
  • By Hetty Gleave, Partner

Agreeing financial arrangements following the breakdown of a marriage or civil partnership is often complex, but aiming to do so during the Coronavirus pandemic poses additional challenges.

Two of the cardinal principles which determine the appropriate financial settlement are “needs” and “sharing”. With uncertainty in the financial markets and in individuals’ financial circumstances, working out what each person will need going forward, and what amounts to a fair share of the family’s assets, is difficult.

Lack of clarity as to the value of assets such as property, businesses, investments and pensions, and fluctuating currency exchange rates mean it is hard for a family to know what their assets are worth.

Some might find that their income is much reduced or be worried about losing their job, whilst others might find their expectations of re-entering the job market are suddenly no longer realistic. Those with underlying health conditions may no longer be safely able to work.

Time spent at home during the lockdown has prompted many to re-evaluate their priorities, with some looking to reduce their working hours or look for more flexible work, impacting future income.

With interest rates and dividend payments generally low, families relying on investment income to meet some or all of their outgoings may face a shortfall.

All of these factors and more will need to be carefully considered if negotiating a financial settlement. If a divorcing couple enter into a settlement at this time, it will not later be possible to seek to revisit the division of their assets based on the effects of the pandemic, given that we already know that it is causing huge financial disruption.

Some may choose to pause their financial negotiations and resume them when there is more certainty about their financial future. Without knowing when that will be, indefinite postponement will not be appealing, and would require agreement as to the interim arrangements to be put in place.

For those who wish to press ahead with negotiations and reach settlement, it may be sensible to include flexibility in respect of some arrangements, with the financial provision to be made dependant on income levels, asset valuations or sale prices. Creative thinking and careful consideration of a wide range of possible scenarios will be important.

The financial crisis resulting from the pandemic will also affect those who have already reached financial settlements. Agreements reached in the past may no longer seem fair.

The scope for revisiting the capital division is very limited – cases decided after the financial crash of 2008 made clear that dramatic reductions in asset values did not justify re-opening settlements. Whilst there may be more scope for arguing that the pandemic and its implications are sufficiently “unforeseen and unforeseeable” to justify re-opening past cases, the potential for such arguments is currently unclear and likely to be of very limited application.

Maintenance, whether for a former spouse or for children, is by contrast always variable, and where a lump sum is payable by instalments, the timing and amount of those instalments can be varied. Whether the court will exercise its power to vary will depend on all of the circumstances, and whilst a judge may look sympathetically on those in genuine financial difficulty, those looking to exploit the situation to reduce their obligations are unlikely to succeed.

The family courts are still suffering from backlogs caused by reduced capacity earlier in the pandemic, and whilst cases are being listed there may be considerable delays. Consideration should however be given to other ways of reaching solutions, including negotiations, arbitration, and mediation – all of which can take place remotely and may be faster and more cost effective.

If you would like to discuss how the current situation affects your financial negotiations or obligations, please be in touch with one of our family team or Hetty Gleave on Hetty.Gleave@hunterslaw.com.

Related News

May 12, 2022
Eri Horrocks examines post-separation assets in Today’s Family Lawyer
May 03, 2022
Polly Atkins reviews guidance on applications for security for costs in Family Law Journal
Apr 26, 2022
Eri Horrocks examines whether post-separation assets can be shared on divorce
Apr 20, 2022
Henry Hood interviewed by Nick Heath at Capital Asset Management
Apr 13, 2022
Henry Hood and Eri Horrocks discuss separation agreements and examine the case of Horohoe v Horohoe in STEP Journal
Mar 30, 2022
Henry Hood and James Vernor-Miles share their advice with unmarried couples co-owning (or buying) property together in Tatler’s Address Book
Mar 01, 2022
Polly Atkins examines the family justice system from the recent case of LS v PS in The Law Society Gazette
Feb 14, 2022
Polly Atkins examines the role of litigation funders vs privileged material in family litigation in Litigation Finance Insider
Feb 11, 2022
Polly Atkins reviews Shades of Scarlet by Anne Fine and discusses a tween’s guide to navigating divorce (for tweens and their parents) in EPrivateClient
Feb 08, 2022
Anna Roiser discusses no-fault divorce and key questions

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)