News

Eri Horrocks discusses family loans and divorce settlements

  • March 30, 2021
  • By Eri Horrocks, Associate

Family loans

Many people borrow money from family members, and such loans feature regularly in divorce and financial remedy cases. How these ‘family loans’ should be factored into the divorce settlement can be contentious, and will depend on the nature of the loan.

Within financial remedy proceedings, lawyers often describe loans as being ‘soft’ or ‘hard’. A soft loan is a loan where there is no – or no immediate – expectation of repayment, or where there will not be a significant consequence to repayment being delayed or indefinitely postponed. A hard loan is a loan that must be repaid within a set time frame.

Clearly, a mortgage, or loan from a bank, is a hard loan. The nature of a loan from family can be harder to identify and will depend on the circumstances, but it may be considered soft. If the loan is substantial, whether it is considered ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ may affect the range of settlement options which are considered fair and/or affordable, and so this can become an important issue.

Existing loans

It may be alleged that the loan was never a loan at all, but a gift, and so does not need to be repaid. The court will look at all the circumstances and the available evidence to determine whether a payment was a loan or a gift.

The more evidence there is supporting the existence of a loan, the more likely it is that a payment will be regarded as having been a loan. Some key questions to think about are;

  1. Was a loan agreement entered into at the time the funds were provided?
  2. Are there text messages, emails or other contemporaneous documents concerning the transfer which may shed light on its nature?
  3. Was a loan agreement made after the funds were provided, and if so in what circumstances?
  4. Have there been other transfers between the ‘lender’ and ‘borrower’ in the past which have been repaid, which might indicate that transactions between the parties tend to be loans?
  5. Is interest being requested or paid?

The circumstances are also important, for example, if the funds were provided by a parent, the nature of the relationship may make it less likely that the funds were a loan, compared to a payment from a cousin or more distant family member. However, family relationships and attitudes to financial arrangements vary greatly, and much will depend on the context of the specific family.

If the existence of a loan is recognised, the next question is whether the loan is ‘hard’ or ‘soft’. Again, much will depend on the individual facts of the case and the available evidence, both in respect of the specific payment and any past practice.

Future loans

Many people consider borrowing money from family to help with living costs or legal fees during the divorce proceedings. Given that debate may well arise as to whether and how family loans should be taken into account in financial remedy proceedings, some choose to pursue other options such as bank loans, credit cards, specialist litigation loans or seeking interim financial provision from their spouse – but these are likely to come with increased costs.

Where a loan from family is the best option, it would be wise to enter into a formal loan agreement creating a contractual relationship to ensure there is documentary evidence reflecting the intention behind the loan. It should be clear on the terms of the loan, such as whether interest is payable, whether security is to be provided and when repayment is due. It is important, however, not to mislead the court or your spouse – if a payment presented as a loan is never repaid and in fact treated as a gift, that could provide a basis for subsequently re-opening the case.

Ultimately, the court will seek to ascertain the reality behind any payments from family members, so that a fair award can be made reflecting the parties’ true financial circumstances.

If you have any questions about family loans or other aspects of family law please contact Eri Horrocks on 020 7412 0050 or Eri.Horrocks@hunterslaw.com.


Related News

Apr 14, 2021
Jo Carr-West discusses a new approach to domestic abuse in the Family Court
Mar 23, 2021
Henry Hood discusses Capitalisation of maintenance and Duxbury Calculations
Mar 17, 2021
Jo Carr-West discusses the capitalisation of child maintenance in Family Law Week
Mar 15, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses top tips for international families on divorce
Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)