News

Details of Liam Gallagher’s divorce to be kept private, but judge criticises lack of clarity on media reporting of cases

  • September 29, 2015
  • By Hunters Law

A High Court judge has ruled that the financial details of Liam Gallagher’s divorce to singer Nicola Appleton cannot be reported in the press.

The couple made a joint application to exclude the press from hearings about the financial aspects of their divorce, called financial remedy proceedings.

Mr Justice Mostyn relaxed two existing interim injunctions, thereby allowing the press to attend the hearings but prohibiting them from reporting details of the parties’ financial affairs. He said details of their children’s lives should also remain private.

In his written judgment, Mr Justice Mostyn said the parties had been forced to provide extensive financial information for the purposes of the proceedings on the basis that it would remain private.

Since 2009 the press have been allowed to attend family court hearings held in private as a “watchdog” to observe how the courts operate. Whilst acknowledging this right, Mr Justice Mostyn said that it did not extend to reporting everything they heard.

He said his comments follow “hard on the heels” of his judgment in the case of DL-v-SL, in which he made an order preserving the anonymity of the parties and securing their privacy in respect of personal and business financial affairs.

Mr Justice Mostyn’s approach is contrary to some other members of the family court judiciary. In the recent divorce of Richard and Ekaterina Fields, Mr Justice Holman, another High Court judge, ordered the financial dispute to be heard in open court. The couple were subsequently subjected to extensive press coverage.

The Independent, Telegraph and Evening Standard all published details of the case. Under the headline “Russian beauty queen received £630,000 divorce pay out from her first husband – after demanding £500,000 from her now estranged second husband to leave him” the Daily Mail Online commented on the couple’s bank balances, health issues and lifestyle during the marriage.

In considering the press intrusion on the couple, Mr Justice Holman said “I regret their distress; but it cannot, in my view, override the importance of court proceedings being…open and transparent.”

Mr Justice Holman’s approach was criticised by Sir Paul Coleridge, a former family High Court judge, and founder of the Marriage Foundation: ” It is very unfair because it means that the threat of an open hearing can be used a weapon to force settlement.”

Many of the judiciary are calling for clarification on the issue of privacy, as Mr Justice Mostyn said in his judgment yesterday:

“To say that the law about the ability of the press to report ancillary relief proceedings (now called financial remedy proceedings) which they are allowed to observe is a mess would be a serious understatement.”

He called on the Court of Appeal to consider the divergence of opinion between judges as to privacy and reporting.

Until there is more certainty, divorcing couples are best advised to avoid using the courts. Non–court based processes, such as mediation and arbitration, enable couples to maintain privacy and control whilst dealing with complex financial settlements on divorce. This is surely a happier prospect for any couple going through divorce. Even the rich and famous need a break from the headlines sometimes.

Vanessa Friend

Hunters

@Huntersfamlaw

Vanessa’s article was also published in The Global Legal Post here.

Related News

Jan 20, 2022
Henry Hood interviewed by Citywealth
Jan 17, 2022
Family Mediation Week: Nicole Derham discusses qualifying as a family law mediator
Jan 17, 2022
Henry Hood discusses how divorce settlements can be influenced by personal asset management during a marriage in STEP Journal Plus
Dec 30, 2021
Henry Hood comments on the highest post-divorce financial settlement awarded by an English court in New Law Journal
Dec 21, 2021
Henry Hood and Eri Horrocks discuss the consequences of failing to make a payment under a court-ordered divorce settlement in EPrivateClient
Dec 15, 2021
Henry Hood and Anna Roiser examine privacy and transparency in financial proceedings on divorce
Dec 10, 2021
Henry Hood comments on Frederick Barclay faces a possible prison sentence after failing to pay a £50m divorce settlement in The Legal Diary
Dec 03, 2021
Philippa Kum discusses arrangements for children of separated parents over the Christmas holidays
Nov 26, 2021
Henry Hood examines the case of WX v HX [2021] EWHC 241 and divorce settlements in EPrivateClient
Nov 25, 2021
Henry Hood awarded Family Law Partner of the Year at the Family Law Awards 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)