News

Company and trust laws help divorcing wife to £17.3 million settlement

  • June 14, 2013
  • By Hunters Law

On 12th June 2013 the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the claimant wife against the companies in the appeal Prest v Petrodel & Ors. Mr Prest could not take part as he had broken earlier court orders, but he is now forced to have his offshore companies transfer London properties to his former wife.

The courts did not use the device of piercing the corporate veil, so declaring that the companies are the same legal entity as the respondent. But on the facts of the case, where the husband had deliberately disclosed almost no precise information or documentation, the judges filled in the gaps and declared that the companies owned the title of the properties only on trust for the husband, who could therefore have them transferred, as a result of the divorce process.

Advisors and divorcing couples will want to look very carefully at the documents where propery or other assets are ostensibly owned by a company or a trust. To protect wealth from future attack on divorce, Hunters recommend the use of pre-nuptial agreements, and also very careful preparation  of all trust and company documentation which owns property, particularly the family home of a director, shareholder, trustee or beneficiary.

If you would like any further information please contact a member of our Family team.

Related News

Jan 28, 2022
Richard Kershaw discusses sharing carried interest in private equity divorces in Lawyer Monthly
Jan 20, 2022
Henry Hood interviewed by Citywealth
Jan 17, 2022
Family Mediation Week: Nicole Derham discusses qualifying as a family law mediator
Jan 17, 2022
Henry Hood discusses how divorce settlements can be influenced by personal asset management during a marriage in STEP Journal Plus
Dec 30, 2021
Henry Hood comments on the highest post-divorce financial settlement awarded by an English court in New Law Journal
Dec 21, 2021
Henry Hood and Eri Horrocks discuss the consequences of failing to make a payment under a court-ordered divorce settlement in EPrivateClient
Dec 15, 2021
Henry Hood and Anna Roiser examine privacy and transparency in financial proceedings on divorce
Dec 10, 2021
Henry Hood comments on Frederick Barclay faces a possible prison sentence after failing to pay a £50m divorce settlement in The Legal Diary
Dec 03, 2021
Philippa Kum discusses arrangements for children of separated parents over the Christmas holidays
Nov 26, 2021
Henry Hood examines the case of WX v HX [2021] EWHC 241 and divorce settlements in EPrivateClient

© Hunters Law LLP 2022 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)