News

Civil Partnership Review Report published

  • July 01, 2014
  • By Hunters Law

The Government has published a report on the conclusions of the review of Civil Partnership Act 2004 as required under the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013.

Following a consultation period, the report confirmed that Civil Partnerships will be capable of conversion into marriage from 10th December 2014 but concluded that no further changes would be made.
A majority of respondents who expressed a view on the three proposed changes to the Civil Partnership were opposed to each of them. Of the over 10,000 online survey answers to each of the relevant questions:

• Less than a third of respondents supported abolition of Civil Partnership;

• The majority were against closing Civil Partnership to new couples;

• Over three-quarters were against opening up Civil Partnership to opposite sex couples.

The report concluded that, given the lack of consensus on the way forward for Civil Partnership, the Government will not be making any changes until the impact of extending marriage to same sex couples could be assessed.

When Civil Partnership was introduced in December 2005, over 16,000 Civil Partnerships were registered in the UK within the first year. Up to the extension of marriage to same sex couples on 29th March 2014, around 6,000 couples each year were registering Civil Partnerships in the UK and, by the end of 2012, 60,454 had been registered. It remains to be seen how many same sex couples will choose to marry rather than enter into a Civil Partnership, or elect to convert their Civil Partnerships in the future.

The Family Department at Hunters is well equipped to help all couples who intend to marry to take control over their own lives and prepare a pre-nuptial agreement. For those intending to convert their Civil Partnerships to marriage in the first wave expected before the end of 2014, it is time to start planning ahead to put a pre-nuptial agreement in place.

For more information, please contact the partner at Hunters having responsibility for your legal matters, or (for new enquiries) please contact a partner in the Family team.

Related News

Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly
Feb 24, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether one can charge an ex-spouse rent whilst waiting for their home to sell
Feb 19, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines whether you can re-open a divorce settlement due to Covid-19 in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary
Feb 02, 2021
Amy Scollan discusses divorce and luxury assets
Feb 01, 2021
Richard Kershaw discusses recent case where an unmarried couple have been ordered to share investment assets
Jan 18, 2021
Family Mediation Week 2021
Nov 19, 2020
Jay Patel and Polly Atkins examine family law in the lead up to Brexit in Family Law Week
Nov 09, 2020
Richard Kershaw discusses trusts on divorce and their role in financial planning strategies
Nov 05, 2020
Hunters recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2021

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.