News

Children and Families Act 2014 comes into force

  • April 22, 2014
  • By Hunters Law

The Children and Families Act 2014 (“CFA 2014”) was given Royal Assent on 13th March 2014 and Parts I and II of the act came into force on 22nd April 2014.

The main changes to private children law cases introduced by the CFA 2014 on 22nd April are:

1.  New child arrangement orders

The introduction of a new “child arrangements order” which replaces the old “contact” and “residence” orders (under section 8(1) of the Children Act 1989).  The child arrangements order deals with where and with whom a child lives, spends time and has contact.  It is hoped that both parents will be encouraged to cooperate together in reaching a holistic solution for the child, rather than each viewing their relations with the child individually.  However, it remains to be seen whether these new orders will contain the same language and legal emphasis as the old contact and residence orders and how they can be enforced.

In line with this, a new Child Arrangements Programme has also been introduced to replace the Private Law Programme.  It applies where there is a dispute between separated parents about arrangements concerning their children and is designed to assist them in reaching a child-focused solution, where possible out of court.

2.  Obligatory mediation information and assessment meetings

Parties are now legally required to attend a mediation information and assessment meeting (“MIAM”) before making an application to court in children cases.  (Previously parties were encouraged, but not obliged, to do so.)  There are, however, some exceptions to this rule, in cases where there is domestic violence or a child protection concern, or other need for urgency, or where the parties have previously attended a MIAM.

3.  No more statements of arrangements for children

Couples going through a divorce/dissolution procedure will no longer have to file a statement of arrangements for children (previously obligatory in all cases where the couple had children under section 41 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1975, now repealed).  This will streamline the process, so that the court need not be concerned with cases where the couple can agree arrangements for their children themselves (whilst still allowing others to apply for a child arrangements order separately if they need to).

4. Restriction of use of expert evidence

Provisions aimed at restricting the use of expert evidence to that which is “necessary” to resolve the proceedings justly (previously just contained in the amended Part 25 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010), are also now put on a statutory footing.

If you would like advice on any of these issues, please contact the partner at Hunters having responsibility for your legal matters, or (for new enquiries) please contact a member of our Family team.

This article is based on the law as at 22nd April 2014.  Although we endeavour to ensure that the content is accurate and up to date as at that date, it is designed to provide general guidance only and is not intended to be comprehensive or to constitute professional advice.  Specific advice should always be sought, and you should only rely on advice which is given, by reference to particular facts and circumstances.

Related News

Apr 09, 2019
Henry Hood comments on the no-fault divorce reform in The Guardian
Apr 05, 2019
Jo Carr-West comments on a £1.3m divorce award despite signing a pre-nuptial agreement in Family Law Week
Apr 04, 2019
Richard Kershaw examines the case of Daga v Bangur and trusts in the Family Division in WealthBriefing
Apr 04, 2019
Rebecca Christie comments on the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths Act 2019 that came into force in The Times
Mar 07, 2019
Richard Kershaw comments on the case of Cowan v Foreman in New Law Journal
Mar 04, 2019
Richard Kershaw examines the case of Daga v Bangur and trusts in the Family Division in Family Law LexisNexis
Feb 06, 2019
Hazel Wright reaccredited by the Family Mediation Council as a specialist family mediator
Dec 17, 2018
Henry Hood comments on the sale of the £4.5 million helicopter in the Akhmedova divorce case in Family Law Week
Nov 23, 2018
Jay Patel comments on a racing driver’s ex-wife’s possible entitlement to a £5 million divorce settlement in Family Law
Nov 09, 2018
Henry Hood comments on Sharia court ignoring an order from the High Court that an oligarch must hand over a £350m yacht to his ex-wife in The Law Society Gazette and Family Law Week

© Hunters Law LLP 2019 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)