News

“Big Money” divorce on appeal to Supreme Court

  • December 17, 2012
  • By Hunters Law

The disappointed ex-wife of oil tycoon, Michael Prest, has been granted permission to appeal the controversial Court of Appeal decision in Petrodel Resources Ltd & Ors -v- Prest & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 1395.

The Court of Appeal’s majority (2:1) decision on 26th October 2012 caused huge controversy in the family law world when they ruled that the High Court judge had been “wrong” to “pierce the corporate veil” and to equate the companies owned and controlled by Mr Prest with Mr Prest himself and to regard their assets as his.  The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal brought by the three companies owned and controlled by Mr Prest against the Order requiring them to transfer assets to Mrs Prest. Mrs Prest has now been granted permission to appeal this decision.

The Court of Appeal decision highlights the tension that exists between, on the one hand, the fact that, in company law, a company is a separate legal entity that is entirely distinct from its members and, on the other, the inclination of the Family Division to look behind corporate structures if that is required in the interest of achieving fairness. Given the constitution of the Court of Appeal in this case, it is perhaps unsurprising that the former prevailed.

Lord Justice Thorpe, the only Family Law specialist sitting in the Court of Appeal and who delivered the dissenting judgment, warned that the Family Division judge’s overriding duty to achieve fairness would be defeated if company law allows a wealthy businessman to “hide” his assets in corporate structures. The Court of Appeal judgement can be read in full here.

The appeal will be heard in the Supreme Court on the 5th and 6th March 2013. The Family team at Hunters are eagerly awaiting the Supreme Court judgment and are following all the developments.

 

Related News

Apr 27, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses arrangements for divorcing couples with pets during National Pet Month
Apr 26, 2021
Polly Atkins examines whether a former spouse can be required to pay rent pending the sale of the family home in STEP Journal+
Apr 22, 2021
Henry Hood comments on Tatiana Akhmedova winning a High Court lawsuit against son in £450m divorce battle in WealthBriefing
Apr 14, 2021
Jo Carr-West discusses a new approach to domestic abuse in the Family Court
Mar 30, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses family loans and divorce settlements
Mar 23, 2021
Henry Hood discusses Capitalisation of maintenance and Duxbury Calculations
Mar 17, 2021
Jo Carr-West discusses the capitalisation of child maintenance in Family Law Week
Mar 15, 2021
Eri Horrocks discusses top tips for international families on divorce
Feb 26, 2021
Richard Kershaw considers the implications of Mr Justice Cohen’s judgment in FRB v DRC (No 3) in Family Law Week
Feb 25, 2021
Richard Kershaw examines the impact of market volatility on divorce settlements in Finance Monthly

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)