News

ASA rules against exaggerated success rate in “instant win” promotions

  • July 30, 2018
  • By Arash Andalibi-Abadan, Trainee Solicitor

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled that instant win promotions on Highland Spring water bottles and packets of McCain French Fries breached The UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing (CAP Code) because the chances of winning a prize were far lower than the promotional material suggested.

Highland Spring bottle labels stated that 10,000 “instant win” prizes could be won. Contestants had to enter their details, bottle batch code and time stamp on a website in order to be entered into the draw. To win, their details would have to match the “moment”, which was a one-second period randomly selected by a computer.

Highland Spring printed short terms and conditions on the back of the labels, but some consumers challenged them as misleading. The ASA found that although the labels stated that not all prizes would be won, there was no information on how the promotion worked or how likely it actually was for a consumer to win a prize.

A similar issue was considered in the McCain case. Unique, random codes were printed on a total of 53,317,540 promotional packs of French fries and a total prize fund of £3,000,000 was available to be won.  This equated to 28,515 prizes or a 0.05% chance of winning. A total of 342,713 promotional pack codes were entered into the instant win promotion, and 159 were awarded prizes – i.e. only 0.56% of the available prizes. In addition, of the prizes won, most were in the lowest value range and only a few higher value prizes were available. The highest prizes were not won.

Both promotional campaigns were found to be misleading and caused unnecessary disappointment for consumers because the mechanisms of winning a prize were not properly explained.  In addition, both were found to have created a significantly exaggerated impression of the likelihood of winning, and the brief statements about chances of success in the terms and conditions were not sufficient.  The lesson is that companies must ensure that their promotional campaigns do not exaggerate consumers’ chances of winning and do not cause them unnecessary disappointment.

Written by Arash Andalibi-Abadan and Cécile de Lagarde

For queries in relation to commercial and business matters, please ask a member of our Business Services team.

Related News

Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times
Feb 12, 2021
Richard Baxter and Hannah Solel examine data protection post-Brexit in Information Security Buzz
Feb 05, 2021
Budget 2021 – Still time to prepare for any changes to Business Asset Disposal Relief
Jan 13, 2021
Stephen Morrall and Hannah Solel discuss the gig economy in 2021 in Employee Benefits
Jan 11, 2021
Richard Baxter and Hannah Solel provide a legal update on data protection in 2021
Jan 06, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on unfair dismissal in Real Business
Dec 14, 2020
Hunters strengthens its Business team with new arrival
Jun 25, 2020
Stephen Morrall and Philippa Kum discuss witnessing a deed remotely
Jun 01, 2020
Amanda Lathia examines the legal challenges of returning to work during the post-COVID-19 lockdown in WealthBriefing

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)