News

Age Discrimination Claim

  • March 23, 2012
  • By Hunters Law

Dismissal to avoid pension liability valid in Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust

Mr Woodcock was the Chief Executive of the North Cumbria PCT and was made redundant when it was merged with another Trust. He claimed that the way in which he had been dismissed amounted to unlawful age discrimination because he was given notice to expire about one month before his 50th birthday, when he would have become entitled to an enhanced pension. The additional cost of that pension would have been between £500,000 and £1,000,000 which the PCT was anxious to avoid.

It is well established that cost alone can never justify age discrimination. Cost is one of the factors that can be put into the balance with others, and an employer will have to show that the treatment complained of was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. In the particular circumstances of Mr Woodcock’s case, it was found that the PCT was not just motivated to save costs, even though the notice of termination given by the PCT was clearly timed to expire before he reached his 50th birthday. However, Mr Woodcock, was geneuinely redundant, the PCT had treated him very generously and he had been given a much longer reprieve from dismissal than he might have expected. In addition, he had no legimitate expectation of the enhanced pension which would have been an undeserved windfall.

This type of case turns on its own facts, and an employer needs to be very careful if it wants to dismiss an older employee where the decision would seem to be motivated simply by the need to save costs.

For more information, please contact Stephen Morrall

Related News

Jul 22, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Constance Tait examine the impact on trademark litigation and provide 10 tips on navigating the post-Brexit era in Managing IP
Jul 16, 2021
Gregor Kleinknecht and Anastassia Dimmek examine the growing threat of zombie firms in Lawyer Monthly
Jul 07, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine a report suggesting that firms with targeted support for ethnic minority workers see benefits
Jun 28, 2021
Richard Baxter discusses UK-EU Data Protection and how adequacy decisions avoid imminent disruption to data flows
Jun 23, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait examine the recent Burnell v Trans-Tag Ltd case in the High Court
Jun 22, 2021
Anastassia Dimmek discussed the key challenges of protecting clients’ healthy businesses from zombie firms in a webinar hosted by Advoselect
Jun 18, 2021
Richard Baxter and Constance Tait discuss the looming annual returns deadline for employee share schemes
May 18, 2021
Hunters hosted the Withdrawal and The Trade Marks Act 1994 webinar
Mar 17, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber drivers entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay and pension following the Supreme Court decision in The Sunday Times Driving, The Times and the Daily Mail
Feb 19, 2021
Stephen Morrall comments on Uber losing a landmark Supreme Court battle in the Evening Standard and the Financial Times

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)