News

A further disincentive to invest in Buy-to-Let properties

  • May 12, 2016
  • By Hunters Law

Under new rules coming into effect from 6th April 2017, owners of second properties will face restrictions on the amount of tax relief they can claim on mortgage interest payments

In the Summer Budget 2015, the Chancellor launched the first of a two pronged attack on buy-to-let landlords, by restricting the tax relief available on buy-to-let mortgage interest payments (the other being the Autumn Statement announcement that Stamp Duty Land Tax rates would be increased by 3% on the purchase of additional residential properties from 1st April 2016).

Owners of let second homes can currently claim tax relief on their mortgage interest payments at their marginal rate of tax, so higher and additional rate payer landlords can claim 40% and 45% per cent tax relief respectively.

The reforms are being phased in from 6th April 2017, and from 6th April 2020, all landlords will be subject to a flat rate of relief of 20%.  The stages are as follows:

  • 2017-2018 tax year: the deduction from property income of mortgage interest payments will be restricted to 75% of those payments, with the remaining 25% being available as a basic rate tax reduction;
  • 2018-2019 tax year: 50% of mortgage interest payments can be deducted from property income, with the remaining 50% available as a basic rate tax reduction; and
  • 2019-2020 tax year: 25% of mortgage interest payments can be deducted from property income, with the remaining 75% available as a basic rate tax reduction.

As well as mortgage interest payments, the new rules will apply to interest on loans to buy furnishings and fees incurred when taking out or repaying mortgages or loans.

A notable exception from the new rules is for properties qualifying as furnished holiday lets, where the current rules will continue to apply.

For more information, please contact the partner having responsibility for your affairs, or for new business any partner in the Private Client Department.

Related News

Feb 08, 2021
Peter Robinson discusses Indexation Based Rent Reviews
Jan 19, 2021
Peter Robinson comments on what new and existing landlords need to know in RBS HomeWise
Jan 04, 2021
Peter Robinson discusses The Supreme Court’s decision in Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd
Dec 11, 2020
Hunters retains Law Society’s Conveyancing Quality Scheme accreditation
Nov 12, 2020
Peter Robinson examines the government’s ban on evictions of commercial tenants during the pandemic and what commercial landlords should consider in The Law Society
Nov 12, 2020
Ben Gurluk comments on the Stamp Duty holiday in the Daily Express
Oct 30, 2020
Peter Robinson examines a recent Supreme Court case that is relevant for property investors in the challenging environment of the retail property market in Lawyer Monthly
Oct 22, 2020
Peter Robinson analyses the government’s extension of moratorium on eviction in New Law Journal
Oct 16, 2020
Peter Robinson examines the economic consequences of COVID-19 for commercial landlords in Property Industry Eye
Oct 16, 2020
Peter Robinson discusses UK property investors facing particular pressures during the pandemic in Property Week

© Hunters Law LLP 2021 | Privacy NoticeLegal & Regulatory | Cookies Policy | Complaints Procedure.

Hunters Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (number 657218)

WARNING: Website falsely claiming to be Hunters Law

4 March 2021

The website 'hunterslawllp.com' is operating, falsely claiming to be Hunters Law. This website has been created to mirror the genuine site, although contact details including telephone number and email addresses have been changed, and the SRA verification badge does not work.

We have also been made aware of a series of faxes circulating, purporting to come from ‘barrister’ Dominik Opalinski, advising of an unclaimed inheritance of $16.95M, which feature the same website address. Dominik is a genuine partner of the firm, but is not a barrister.

We have reported this to the SRA, and contacted the website domain hosts to request its urgent removal. If you receive correspondence of a similar nature to that described, please contact us directly by reliable and established means.